aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--todo.txt25
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/todo.txt b/todo.txt
index 2a2a5bff4..080100593 100644
--- a/todo.txt
+++ b/todo.txt
@@ -1,26 +1,20 @@
-
test if get_attachments_for_display called multiple times in one request?
-(MyModel.column_names - ['column_to_exclude']).join(', ')
-
-get_text_for_indexing(quick) could be used in ./views/track_mailer/event_digest.rhtml
-
-This is pretty good:
- c = IncomingMessage.find(40315).cached_attachment_text; p c.size; c.gsub!(/[^\w\s]+/, ' '); c.gsub!(/\s+/, ' '); p c.size; p c[0,2000]
-Can we somehow reduce attachment cache size?
+Some requests to lower memory use of still:
+PID: 676 CONSUME MEMORY: 16968 KB Now: 102604 KB http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/parking_ticket_data_81
-This is good test too:
-egrep "CONSUME MEMORY: [0-9]{7} KB" production.log
-
-blackpool seems slow;
-cat:~/keep/devel/mysociety/foi/cache$ time lynx -source http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/blackpool_borough_council?page=2 > /dev/null
-real 0m1.542s
+PID: 2036 CONSUME MEMORY: 129368 KB Now: 179652 KB http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/14186/response/33740
+- search engines shouldn't be going for those URLs. and do they really need to
+ unpack so much? could use snippet cache.
Next (things that will reduce admin time mainly)
====
+Ask people for annotation immediately after they have submitted their request
+Ask for annotation about what they learnt from request?
+
Have proper house rules / site terms and conditions page.
Perhaps borrow from these house rules:
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/houserules/
@@ -178,9 +172,6 @@ Sort requests on user page by status.
Make search know about uncategorised requests and timed out requests.
And make search able to do *current* status in general as operator.
-Ask people for annotation immediately after they have submitted their request
-Ask for annotation about what they learnt from request?
-
I have several email alerts set up. Is there any chance they could include part
(or, preferably, all) of the search criterion in the Subject: line? :o)
(Perhaps do it in the case when only one search criterion makes the mail)