diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | app/models/info_request_event.rb | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | todo.txt | 8 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/app/models/info_request_event.rb b/app/models/info_request_event.rb index b040f6320..3926780c7 100644 --- a/app/models/info_request_event.rb +++ b/app/models/info_request_event.rb @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ # Copyright (c) 2007 UK Citizens Online Democracy. All rights reserved. # Email: francis@mysociety.org; WWW: http://www.mysociety.org/ # -# $Id: info_request_event.rb,v 1.44 2008-05-19 12:01:22 francis Exp $ +# $Id: info_request_event.rb,v 1.45 2008-05-19 21:28:07 francis Exp $ class InfoRequestEvent < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :info_request @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ class InfoRequestEvent < ActiveRecord::Base # Full text search indexing acts_as_xapian :texts => [ :search_text_main, :title ], :values => [ [ :created_at, 0, "created_at", :date ], - [ :rss_at, 1, "rss_at", :date ], + [ :rss_at, 1, "rss_at", :number ], # XXX using number for lack of :datetime support in Xapian [ :request, 2, "request_collapse", :string ] ], :terms => [ [ :calculated_state, 'S', "status" ], @@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ class InfoRequestEvent < ActiveRecord::Base # response (e.g. successful) in which case we want to date sort by # when the responses was described as being of the type. For other # types, just use the create at date. - self.last_described_at || self.created_at + date = self.last_described_at || self.created_at + return date.strftime("%Y%m%d%H%M%S") # format it here as no datetime support in Xapian's value ranges end def search_text_main text = '' @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ BAILII - relationship with law courts, robots.txt ? Next ==== -Block new messages to particular requests (for those we failed to spam protect -in time) - Blog posts / Wikipedia articles about this request e.g. http://socialreporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/costs-of-the-bbc-action-action-network/ http://reportr.net/2008/04/24/bbc-spent-6m-to-develop-the-iplayer/ @@ -46,11 +43,11 @@ separately Bit confusing that sort order when you do "variety:successful" in query is by the date of creation. Should probably use the described date a lot more often for dates. But not sure, hard to tell. -Fix up the privacy policy - Advertise WDTK search queries on TWFY Advertise alerts on end pages with WDTK +Do some performance profiling + Later ===== @@ -224,6 +221,7 @@ Quoting fixing TODO: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/235/response/513 http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/40/response/163 - Disclaimer http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/265/response/688 - word wrapping + http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/180/response/482 (charset) Sources of public bodies ======================== |