aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/about.en.rhtml51
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/about.es.rhtml1
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/about.rhtml4
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/about.sr.rhtml51
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/contact.en.rhtml105
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml105
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/credits.en.rhtml90
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml90
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/officers.en.rhtml245
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml245
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml184
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml184
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml293
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/requesting.rhtml2
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml293
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml110
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml110
17 files changed, 4 insertions, 2159 deletions
diff --git a/app/views/help/about.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 89a67d069..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/about.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "About" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="introduction">Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="purpose">What is WhatDoTheyKnow for? <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>To help you find out inside information about what the UK government
-is doing.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="premise">How does the site work? <a href="#premise">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
-write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your request
-to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically published on the
-website for you and anyone else to find and read.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="whybother_me">Why would I bother to do this? <a href="#whybother_me">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
-things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national defence. Some
-it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about how government
-works, the better able we are to make suggestions to improve the things that
-are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are done well.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="whybother_them">Why would the public authority bother to reply? <a href="#whybother_them">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. The response
-will either contain the information you want, or give a valid legal reason why
-it must be kept confidential.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="who">Who makes WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#who">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by <a href="http://www.mysociety.org">mySociety</a>,
-and was initially <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/">funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust</a>. mySociety is a project of the
-registered charity <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>.
-If you like what we're doing, then you can
-<a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="updates">How can I keep up with news about WhatDoTheyKnow?<a href="#updates">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>We have a <a href="/blog">blog</a> and a <a href="http://www.twitter.com/whatdotheyknow">twitter feed</a>.
-</dd>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/requesting">making requests</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/app/views/help/about.es.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.es.rhtml
index dc6079cd2..721a582aa 100644
--- a/app/views/help/about.es.rhtml
+++ b/app/views/help/about.es.rhtml
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
<p>Esta sito tu aidare a faire los requesti a la governmenti Seblano</p>
<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
diff --git a/app/views/help/about.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.rhtml
index 741aa7c33..89a67d069 100644
--- a/app/views/help/about.rhtml
+++ b/app/views/help/about.rhtml
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-<% @title = "Rreth nesh" %>
+<% @title = "About" %>
<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-<h1 id="introduction">Hyrje ne Informata Zyrtare <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
+<h1 id="introduction">Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
<dl>
<dt id="purpose">What is WhatDoTheyKnow for? <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
diff --git a/app/views/help/about.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 89a67d069..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/about.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "About" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="introduction">Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="purpose">What is WhatDoTheyKnow for? <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>To help you find out inside information about what the UK government
-is doing.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="premise">How does the site work? <a href="#premise">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
-write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your request
-to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically published on the
-website for you and anyone else to find and read.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="whybother_me">Why would I bother to do this? <a href="#whybother_me">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
-things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national defence. Some
-it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about how government
-works, the better able we are to make suggestions to improve the things that
-are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are done well.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="whybother_them">Why would the public authority bother to reply? <a href="#whybother_them">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. The response
-will either contain the information you want, or give a valid legal reason why
-it must be kept confidential.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="who">Who makes WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#who">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by <a href="http://www.mysociety.org">mySociety</a>,
-and was initially <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/">funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust</a>. mySociety is a project of the
-registered charity <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>.
-If you like what we're doing, then you can
-<a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="updates">How can I keep up with news about WhatDoTheyKnow?<a href="#updates">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>We have a <a href="/blog">blog</a> and a <a href="http://www.twitter.com/whatdotheyknow">twitter feed</a>.
-</dd>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/requesting">making requests</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/app/views/help/contact.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/contact.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 9dd4d4106..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/contact.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Contact us" %>
-
-<%= foi_error_messages_for :contact %>
-
-<div id="contact_preamble">
-
- <% if !flash[:notice] %>
- <h1>Contact an authority to get official information</h1>
- <ul>
- <li><a href="/new">Go here</a> to make a request, in public, for information
- from UK public authorities.</li>
-
- <li>
- Asking for private information about yourself?
- Please read our help page about
- <a href="/help/requesting#data_protection">data protection</a>.
- </li>
- </ul>
-
- <h1>Take up an issue with Government</h1>
-
- <ul>
- <li><a href="http://www.writetothem.com">Write to your MP,
- local councillor or other representative</a>.
- <li><a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/">Number 10</a> is a good place to start if you would like to take an issue up with central government. </li>
- </ul>
-
-
- <% end %>
-
- <h1>Contact the WhatDoTheyKnow team</h1>
- <% if !flash[:notice] %>
- <ul>
- <li>
- Please read the <a href="/help/about">help page</a> first, as it may
- answer your question quicker.
- </li>
-
- <li>We'd love to hear how you've found using this site.
- Either fill in this form, or send an email to <a
- href="mailto:<%=@contact_email%>"><%=@contact_email%></a>
- </li>
-
- <li>We are a <strong>charity</strong> and not part of the
- Government.</li>
- </ul>
- <% end %>
-</div>
-
-<% form_for :contact do |f| %>
-
- <% if not @user %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_name">Your name:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :name, :size => 20 %>
- (or <%= link_to "sign in", signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
- </p>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_email">Your email:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :email, :size => 20 %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_subject">Subject:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :subject, :size => 50 %>
- </p>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Message to website:</label>
- <%= f.text_area :message, :rows => 10, :cols => 60 %>
- </p>
-
- <% if !@last_request.nil? %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to request:</label>
- <%=request_link(@last_request) %>
- <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
- <% if !@last_body.nil? %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to authority:</label>
- <%=public_body_link(@last_body) %>
- <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
-
- <p class="form_note">
- We can only help you with <strong>technical problems</strong>, or questions
- about Freedom of Information. See the top of this page if you would like to
- contact the Government.
- </P>
-
-
- <div class="form_button">
- <%= hidden_field_tag(:submitted_contact_form, 1) %>
- <%= submit_tag "Send message to the charity" %>
- &lt;-- we run this site, not the Government!
- </div>
-
-<% end %>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 1f50a46f0..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Contact us - sr" %>
-
-<%= foi_error_messages_for :contact %>
-
-<div id="contact_preamble">
-
- <% if !flash[:notice] %>
- <h1>Contact an authority to get official information</h1>
- <ul>
- <li><a href="/new">Go here</a> to make a request, in public, for information
- from UK public authorities.</li>
-
- <li>
- Asking for private information about yourself?
- Please read our help page about
- <a href="/help/requesting#data_protection">data protection</a>.
- </li>
- </ul>
-
- <h1>Take up an issue with Government</h1>
-
- <ul>
- <li><a href="http://www.writetothem.com">Write to your MP,
- local councillor or other representative</a>.
- <li><a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/">Number 10</a> is a good place to start if you would like to take an issue up with central government. </li>
- </ul>
-
-
- <% end %>
-
- <h1>Contact the WhatDoTheyKnow team</h1>
- <% if !flash[:notice] %>
- <ul>
- <li>
- Please read the <a href="/help/about">help page</a> first, as it may
- answer your question quicker.
- </li>
-
- <li>We'd love to hear how you've found using this site.
- Either fill in this form, or send an email to <a
- href="mailto:<%=@contact_email%>"><%=@contact_email%></a>
- </li>
-
- <li>We are a <strong>charity</strong> and not part of the
- Government.</li>
- </ul>
- <% end %>
-</div>
-
-<% form_for :contact do |f| %>
-
- <% if not @user %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_name">Your name:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :name, :size => 20 %>
- (or <%= link_to "sign in", signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
- </p>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_email">Your email:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :email, :size => 20 %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_subject">Subject:</label>
- <%= f.text_field :subject, :size => 50 %>
- </p>
-
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Message to website:</label>
- <%= f.text_area :message, :rows => 10, :cols => 60 %>
- </p>
-
- <% if !@last_request.nil? %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to request:</label>
- <%=request_link(@last_request) %>
- <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
- <% if !@last_body.nil? %>
- <p>
- <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to authority:</label>
- <%=public_body_link(@last_body) %>
- <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
- </p>
- <% end %>
-
- <p class="form_note">
- We can only help you with <strong>technical problems</strong>, or questions
- about Freedom of Information. See the top of this page if you would like to
- contact the Government.
- </P>
-
-
- <div class="form_button">
- <%= hidden_field_tag(:submitted_contact_form, 1) %>
- <%= submit_tag "Send message to the charity" %>
- &lt;-- we run this site, not the Government!
- </div>
-
-<% end %>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/credits.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/credits.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index ce7b5f123..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/credits.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Credit where credit is due" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="credits"><%= @title%> <a href="#credits">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="thanks">Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#thanks">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Oh, nearly everyone (and <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus">maybe you too</a>)!
-<ul>
-<li>
- <a href="http://www.yrtk.org">Heather Brooke</a>
- (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews">vampy!</a>) has
- been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive for years now.
-</li>
-<li>
- Both Phil Rodgers and <a href="http://www.flourish.org/blog/">Francis Irving</a>
- entered it in a mySociety competition for ideas for public interest websites to build.
-</li>
-<li>
- <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/">It won</a>,
- and then Chris Lightfoot (<a href="http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html">RIP :(</a>)
- thought up the wheeze of intercepting email responses to requests and
- automatically publishing them.
-</li>
-<li>
- Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from
- <a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/">a dead chocolate mogul</a> (<em>thank you!</em>) ...
-</li>
-<li>
- ... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise Crow, Matthew Somerville
- and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of design and coding to build
- what you see today.
-</li>
-<li>
- Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (<a href="http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/">great blog!</a>),
- Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard for using the site early on and giving
- feedback (and/or legal advice!), and also to all our other users and
- testers.
-</li>
-<li>
- The amazing team of volunteers who run the site, answer your support
- emails, maintain the database of public authorities and
- <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/10/13/behind-whatdotheyknow/">so much more</a>.
- Thanks to John Cross, Ben Harris, Adam McGreggor, Alex Skene,
- Richard Taylor.
-</li>
-<li>
- Volunteers who have provided patches to the code - thanks Peter Collingbourne
- and Tony Bowden.
-</li>
-<li>
- Everyone who has helped look up FOI email addresses.
-</li>
-<li>
- We couldn't do any of this without those
- <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees">crazy people</a> who volunteer,
- amongst many other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return.
-</li>
-<li>
- Finally, all the officers and servants who have answered the many requests
- made through the site. Their diligence, patience and professionalism is
- what has actually made the information that you see here. Thank them for
- helping make Government more transparent.
-</li>
-</ul>
-You're all stars.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="helpus">Can I help out? <a href="#helpus">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>
- <p>Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers.</p>
- <ul>
- <li>You can <a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>. We're a registered charity.</li>
- <li>Help people find successful requests, and monitor performance of authorities, by
- <a href="/categorise/play">playing the categorisation game</a>. </li>
- <li>Find out FOI email addresses of <a href="/help/requesting#missing_body">authorities that we're missing</a>.</li>
- <li>Write a blog post about either WhatDoTheyKnow or an interesting request that you've
- found. Post about it on a forum that you frequent. Tell friends about it.</li> <li>If you're
- a programmer, get the source code for our parent project, <a href="http://alaveteli.org">Alaveteli</a>
- and tell us about patches we can pull. It's made in Ruby on Rails.
- <li>Read more about <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus/">volunteering with mySociety</a>.
- </ul>
-</dd>
-
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index ce7b5f123..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Credit where credit is due" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="credits"><%= @title%> <a href="#credits">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="thanks">Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#thanks">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Oh, nearly everyone (and <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus">maybe you too</a>)!
-<ul>
-<li>
- <a href="http://www.yrtk.org">Heather Brooke</a>
- (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews">vampy!</a>) has
- been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive for years now.
-</li>
-<li>
- Both Phil Rodgers and <a href="http://www.flourish.org/blog/">Francis Irving</a>
- entered it in a mySociety competition for ideas for public interest websites to build.
-</li>
-<li>
- <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/">It won</a>,
- and then Chris Lightfoot (<a href="http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html">RIP :(</a>)
- thought up the wheeze of intercepting email responses to requests and
- automatically publishing them.
-</li>
-<li>
- Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from
- <a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/">a dead chocolate mogul</a> (<em>thank you!</em>) ...
-</li>
-<li>
- ... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise Crow, Matthew Somerville
- and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of design and coding to build
- what you see today.
-</li>
-<li>
- Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (<a href="http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/">great blog!</a>),
- Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard for using the site early on and giving
- feedback (and/or legal advice!), and also to all our other users and
- testers.
-</li>
-<li>
- The amazing team of volunteers who run the site, answer your support
- emails, maintain the database of public authorities and
- <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/10/13/behind-whatdotheyknow/">so much more</a>.
- Thanks to John Cross, Ben Harris, Adam McGreggor, Alex Skene,
- Richard Taylor.
-</li>
-<li>
- Volunteers who have provided patches to the code - thanks Peter Collingbourne
- and Tony Bowden.
-</li>
-<li>
- Everyone who has helped look up FOI email addresses.
-</li>
-<li>
- We couldn't do any of this without those
- <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees">crazy people</a> who volunteer,
- amongst many other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return.
-</li>
-<li>
- Finally, all the officers and servants who have answered the many requests
- made through the site. Their diligence, patience and professionalism is
- what has actually made the information that you see here. Thank them for
- helping make Government more transparent.
-</li>
-</ul>
-You're all stars.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="helpus">Can I help out? <a href="#helpus">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>
- <p>Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers.</p>
- <ul>
- <li>You can <a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>. We're a registered charity.</li>
- <li>Help people find successful requests, and monitor performance of authorities, by
- <a href="/categorise/play">playing the categorisation game</a>. </li>
- <li>Find out FOI email addresses of <a href="/help/requesting#missing_body">authorities that we're missing</a>.</li>
- <li>Write a blog post about either WhatDoTheyKnow or an interesting request that you've
- found. Post about it on a forum that you frequent. Tell friends about it.</li> <li>If you're
- a programmer, get the source code for our parent project, <a href="http://alaveteli.org">Alaveteli</a>
- and tell us about patches we can pull. It's made in Ruby on Rails.
- <li>Read more about <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus/">volunteering with mySociety</a>.
- </ul>
-</dd>
-
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/officers.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/officers.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b20ca31a..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/officers.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,245 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "FOI officer questions" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="officers"><%= @title %> <a href="#officers">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
-of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
-
-<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
-simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
-The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
-the Internet.
-</p>
-<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
-You might also like to read the <a
-href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
-the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
-site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
-any requests made using the site.
-
-<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
-thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="responses">Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests? <a href="#responses">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
-public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We
-also hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any
-subject that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information
-responses contain public information, which anybody could easily request
-again from the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to
-publish it widely.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="realpeople">Are the people making requests real people? <a href="#realpeople">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
-computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before
-they can send a request, each user must register on the site with a
-unique email address that we then verify. You can search this site and
-find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="email_only">An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request! <a href="#email_only">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Yes it is. This
-<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
-in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
-behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
-<p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
-different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
-making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
-via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
-for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
-<p>If that isn't enough for you, the
-<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
-the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
-appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
-email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
-href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
-use.</p>
-<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
-"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
-sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
-any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
-If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
-and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
-up what happened to the message.
-</p>
-<p>Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
-needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
-each request page.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="days">How do you calculate the deadline shown on request pages?<a href="#days">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>The Freedom of Information Act says:</p>
-
-<blockquote><p>A public authority must comply with section 1(1) <strong>promptly</strong> and
-in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
-receipt.</p></blockquote>
-
-<p>The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
-the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
-here is that the law says authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong>.</p>
-
-<p>If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
-process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
-sentence or two saying what is happening. </p>
-
-<p>FOI officers often have to do a lot of <strong>hard work</strong> to answer
-requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
-to have more of that complexity visible.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="days2">But really, how do you calculate the deadline?<a href="#days2">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
-must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
-it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
-taking the extra time to do.
-</p>
-
-<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
-for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
-
-<ul>
-
-<li>If the day we deliver the request by email is a working day, we count that
-as "day zero", even if it was delivered late in the evening. Days end at
-midnight. We then count the next working day as "day one", and so on up to
-<strong>20 working days</strong>.</li>
-
-<li>If the day the request email was delivered was a non-working day, we count
-the next working day as "day one". Delivery is delivery, even if it happened on
-the weekend. Some authorities <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_regarding_body_scans#incoming-1100">disagree with this</a>, our lawyer disagrees with them. </li>
-
-<li>Requesters are encouraged to mark when they have <strong>clarified</strong>
-their request so the clock resets, but sometimes they get this wrong. If you
-see a problem with a particular request, let us know and we'll fix it.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
-Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
-one case which is not normal, see the next question about
-<a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
-disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
-whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
-during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
-</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
-Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
-<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="public_interest_test">How do you reflect time extensions for public interest tests?<a href="#public_interest_test">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
-extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>. Information
-Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
-complex" cases
-(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
-WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
-phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
-exceeded.
-</p>
-
-<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
-Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
-to answer. WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
-with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
-</p>
-
-<p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
-interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
-remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
-of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
-href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
-to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
-of the UK Act through Parliament).
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="large_file">How can I send a large file, which won't go by email?<a href="#large_file">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
-browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
-the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
-is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="names">Why do you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails? <a href="#names">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
-to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
-circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
-responses to requests. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
-missed one.
-For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
-<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
- href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
-forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
-form in an annotation.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
-world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
-
-If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
-copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
-to take it down. However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
-requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
-</dd>
-
-</dl>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
-<br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b20ca31a..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,245 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "FOI officer questions" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="officers"><%= @title %> <a href="#officers">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
-of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
-
-<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
-simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
-The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
-the Internet.
-</p>
-<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
-You might also like to read the <a
-href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
-the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
-site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
-any requests made using the site.
-
-<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
-thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="responses">Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests? <a href="#responses">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
-public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We
-also hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any
-subject that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information
-responses contain public information, which anybody could easily request
-again from the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to
-publish it widely.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="realpeople">Are the people making requests real people? <a href="#realpeople">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
-computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before
-they can send a request, each user must register on the site with a
-unique email address that we then verify. You can search this site and
-find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="email_only">An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request! <a href="#email_only">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Yes it is. This
-<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
-in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
-behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
-<p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
-different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
-making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
-via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
-for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
-<p>If that isn't enough for you, the
-<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
-the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
-appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
-email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
-href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
-use.</p>
-<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
-"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
-sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
-any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
-If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
-and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
-up what happened to the message.
-</p>
-<p>Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
-needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
-each request page.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="days">How do you calculate the deadline shown on request pages?<a href="#days">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>The Freedom of Information Act says:</p>
-
-<blockquote><p>A public authority must comply with section 1(1) <strong>promptly</strong> and
-in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
-receipt.</p></blockquote>
-
-<p>The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
-the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
-here is that the law says authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong>.</p>
-
-<p>If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
-process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
-sentence or two saying what is happening. </p>
-
-<p>FOI officers often have to do a lot of <strong>hard work</strong> to answer
-requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
-to have more of that complexity visible.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="days2">But really, how do you calculate the deadline?<a href="#days2">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
-must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
-it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
-taking the extra time to do.
-</p>
-
-<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
-for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
-
-<ul>
-
-<li>If the day we deliver the request by email is a working day, we count that
-as "day zero", even if it was delivered late in the evening. Days end at
-midnight. We then count the next working day as "day one", and so on up to
-<strong>20 working days</strong>.</li>
-
-<li>If the day the request email was delivered was a non-working day, we count
-the next working day as "day one". Delivery is delivery, even if it happened on
-the weekend. Some authorities <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_regarding_body_scans#incoming-1100">disagree with this</a>, our lawyer disagrees with them. </li>
-
-<li>Requesters are encouraged to mark when they have <strong>clarified</strong>
-their request so the clock resets, but sometimes they get this wrong. If you
-see a problem with a particular request, let us know and we'll fix it.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
-Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
-one case which is not normal, see the next question about
-<a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
-disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
-whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
-during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
-</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
-Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
-<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="public_interest_test">How do you reflect time extensions for public interest tests?<a href="#public_interest_test">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
-extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>. Information
-Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
-complex" cases
-(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
-WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
-phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
-exceeded.
-</p>
-
-<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
-Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
-to answer. WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
-with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
-</p>
-
-<p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
-interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
-remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
-of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
-href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
-to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
-of the UK Act through Parliament).
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="large_file">How can I send a large file, which won't go by email?<a href="#large_file">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
-browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
-the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
-is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="names">Why do you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails? <a href="#names">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
-to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
-circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
-responses to requests. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
-missed one.
-For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
-<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
- href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
-forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
-form in an annotation.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
-world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
-
-If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
-copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
-to take it down. However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
-requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
-</dd>
-
-</dl>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
-<br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 001427181..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Your privacy" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="privacy"><%= @title %> <a href="#privacy">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="email_address">Who gets to see my email address? <a href="#email_address">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
-or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
-request to. They only get to see an email address
-@whatdotheyknow.com which is specific to that request. </p>
-<p>If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
-email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="nasty_spam">Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address? <a href="#nasty_spam">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
-relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
-or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
-sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law, or
-you ask us to.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="public_request">Why will my name and my request appear publicly on the site? <a href="#public_request">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
-make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
-requests (<a href="#delete_requests">more details</a>).
-</p>
-<p>
-Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
-It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
-writes the response to your request. Using your real name also helps people
-get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you.
-</p>
-<p>By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
-Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
-to publish your full name.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="real_name">Can I make an FOI request using a pseudonym? <a href="#real_name">#</a> </dt>
-
-
-<dd>
-<p>Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/name_of_applicant_fop083_v1.pdf">guidance from the Information Commissioner</a> (January 2009).
-</p>
-
-<p>However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
-authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
-You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
-used a pseudonym.</p>
-
-<p>Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
-pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
-Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
-</p>
-
-<p>There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>Use a different form of your name. The guidance says
-that "Mr Arthur Thomas Roberts" can make a valid request as "Arthur Roberts",
-"A. T. Roberts", or "Mr Roberts", but <strong>not</strong> as "Arthur" or "A.T.R.".
-</li>
-<li>Women may use their maiden name.</li>
-<li>In most cases, you may use any name by which you are "widely known and/or
-is regularly used".
-<li>Use the name of an organisation, the name of a company, the trading name of
-a company, or the trading name of a sole trader.
-<li>Ask someone else to make the request on your behalf.
-<li>You may, if you are really stuck, ask us to make the request on
-your behalf. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with
-a good reason why you cannot make the request yourself and cannot
-ask a friend to. We don't have the resources to do this for everyone.
-</ul>
-
-<p>Please do not try to impersonate someone else.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="full_address">They've asked for my postal address! <a href="#full_address">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
-that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence",
-and that the email address you are using is sufficient.
-</p>
-<p>
-The Ministry of Justice has <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm">guidance
-on this</a> &ndash;
-<em>"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
-transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable
-... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
-address should be treated as the return address."
-</em>
-</p>
-<p>As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_2008_final.pdf">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
-<em>"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."</em>
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
-they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
-to scan in the documents for you. You can even <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outgoing-532">offer to gift them a scanner</a>, which in that particular case
-embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already.</p>
-
-<p>If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
-in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
-give you an email address to use for that purpose.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="delete_requests">Can you delete my requests, or alter my name? <a href="#delete_requests">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
-Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
-a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
-reason, we will not delete requests.
-</p>
-
-<p>Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
-on the website, <a href="#takedown">see the next question</a>.
-Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
-</p>
-
-<p>If you're worried about this before you make your request,
-see the section on <a href="#real_name">pseudonyms</a>.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="takedown">Can you take down personal information about me? <a href="#takedown">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
-us to remove or hide, then please <a href="/help/contact">let us know</a>.
-Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
-where it appears on the site.</p>
-
-<p>If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
-posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
-requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
-concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
-pointing out anything they see.</p>
-
-<p>We consider that there is a strong public interest in
-retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
-remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
-a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
-safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
-such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
-line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
-which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
-been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website.</p>
-
-<p>For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
-whether information should be removed.
-<a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3190650"> Section 32</a>
-of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
-publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
-as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
-that authorities resend these with the personal information removed.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Learn more</strong> from the help for <a href="/help/officers">FOI officers</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 001427181..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Your privacy" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="privacy"><%= @title %> <a href="#privacy">#</a> </h1>
-
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="email_address">Who gets to see my email address? <a href="#email_address">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
-or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
-request to. They only get to see an email address
-@whatdotheyknow.com which is specific to that request. </p>
-<p>If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
-email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="nasty_spam">Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address? <a href="#nasty_spam">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
-relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
-or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
-sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law, or
-you ask us to.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="public_request">Why will my name and my request appear publicly on the site? <a href="#public_request">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
-make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
-requests (<a href="#delete_requests">more details</a>).
-</p>
-<p>
-Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
-It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
-writes the response to your request. Using your real name also helps people
-get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you.
-</p>
-<p>By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
-Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
-to publish your full name.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="real_name">Can I make an FOI request using a pseudonym? <a href="#real_name">#</a> </dt>
-
-
-<dd>
-<p>Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/name_of_applicant_fop083_v1.pdf">guidance from the Information Commissioner</a> (January 2009).
-</p>
-
-<p>However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
-authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
-You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
-used a pseudonym.</p>
-
-<p>Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
-pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
-Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
-</p>
-
-<p>There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>Use a different form of your name. The guidance says
-that "Mr Arthur Thomas Roberts" can make a valid request as "Arthur Roberts",
-"A. T. Roberts", or "Mr Roberts", but <strong>not</strong> as "Arthur" or "A.T.R.".
-</li>
-<li>Women may use their maiden name.</li>
-<li>In most cases, you may use any name by which you are "widely known and/or
-is regularly used".
-<li>Use the name of an organisation, the name of a company, the trading name of
-a company, or the trading name of a sole trader.
-<li>Ask someone else to make the request on your behalf.
-<li>You may, if you are really stuck, ask us to make the request on
-your behalf. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with
-a good reason why you cannot make the request yourself and cannot
-ask a friend to. We don't have the resources to do this for everyone.
-</ul>
-
-<p>Please do not try to impersonate someone else.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="full_address">They've asked for my postal address! <a href="#full_address">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
-that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence",
-and that the email address you are using is sufficient.
-</p>
-<p>
-The Ministry of Justice has <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm">guidance
-on this</a> &ndash;
-<em>"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
-transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable
-... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
-address should be treated as the return address."
-</em>
-</p>
-<p>As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_2008_final.pdf">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
-<em>"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."</em>
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
-they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
-to scan in the documents for you. You can even <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outgoing-532">offer to gift them a scanner</a>, which in that particular case
-embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already.</p>
-
-<p>If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
-in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
-give you an email address to use for that purpose.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="delete_requests">Can you delete my requests, or alter my name? <a href="#delete_requests">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
-Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
-a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
-reason, we will not delete requests.
-</p>
-
-<p>Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
-on the website, <a href="#takedown">see the next question</a>.
-Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
-</p>
-
-<p>If you're worried about this before you make your request,
-see the section on <a href="#real_name">pseudonyms</a>.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="takedown">Can you take down personal information about me? <a href="#takedown">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
-us to remove or hide, then please <a href="/help/contact">let us know</a>.
-Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
-where it appears on the site.</p>
-
-<p>If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
-posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
-requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
-concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
-pointing out anything they see.</p>
-
-<p>We consider that there is a strong public interest in
-retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
-remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
-a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
-safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
-such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
-line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
-which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
-been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website.</p>
-
-<p>For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
-whether information should be removed.
-<a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3190650"> Section 32</a>
-of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
-publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
-as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
-that authorities resend these with the personal information removed.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Learn more</strong> from the help for <a href="/help/officers">FOI officers</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 203de623b..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,293 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Making requests engish yes" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="making_requests"><%= @title %> <a href="#making_requests">#</a> </h1>
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="which_authority">I'm not sure which authority to make my request to, how can I find out? <a href="#which_authority">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
-who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
-<ul>
-<li>Browse or search WhatDoTheyKnow looking for similar requests to yours.</li>
-<li>When you've found an authority you think might have the information, use
-the "home page" link on the right hand side of their page to check what they do
-on their website.</li>
-<li>Contact the authority by phone or email to ask if they hold the kind of
-information you're after.</li>
-<li>Don't worry excessively about getting the right authority. If you get it
-wrong, they ought to advise you who to make the request to instead.
-</li>
-<li>If you've got a thorny case, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> for help.</li>
-</ul>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-
-<dt id="missing_body">You're missing the public authority that I want to request from! <a href="#missing_body">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with the name of the public authority and,
-if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
-</p>
-<p>If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
-to hear from you too.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="authorities">Why do you include some authorities that aren't formally subject to FOI?<a href="#authorities">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow lets you make requests for information to a range of
-organisations:</p>
-
-<ul>
- <li> Those formally subject to the FOI Act</li>
- <li> Those formally subject to the Environmental Regulations (a less well
- defined group)</li>
- <li> Those which voluntarily comply with the FOI Act</li>
- <li> Those which aren't subject to the Act but we think should be, on grounds
- such as them having significant public responsibilities.
- </li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
-scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
-to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="focused">Why must I keep my request focused?<a href="#focused">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>
-Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
-easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
-<i>not</i> include any of the following:
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>arguments about your cause</li>
-<li>statements that could defame or insult others</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>
-If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
-libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
-make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
-requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
-Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
-run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
-need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
-and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
-"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
-from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
-annotations after submitting the request).
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="fees">Does it cost me anything to make a request?<a href="#fees">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>Making an FOI request is nearly always free.</p>
-
-<p>Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
-acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
-They hardly ever will actually charge a fee. If they do, they can only charge you if
-you have specifically agreed in advance to pay. <a
- href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/chargingafee.pdf">More
- details</a> from the Information Commissioner.
-</p>
-
-<p>Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
-of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
-public authorities). At this point you can refine your
-request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
-spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-
-<dt id="quickly_response">How quickly will I get a response? <a href="#quickly_response">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>By law, public authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to
-requests.
-</p>
-
-<p>Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
-20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
-or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
-(<a href="/help/officers#days">full details</a>).
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow will email you if you don't get a timely response. You can
-then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
-are breaking the law.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="deadline_extended">Deadline extended <a href="#deadline_extended">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>By law, public authorities must needs <strong>more time</strong> for request ... (TO DO)
-</p>
-
-
-</dd>
-<dt id="no_response">What if I never get a response?<a href="#no_response">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>There are several things you can do if you never get a response.</p>
-<ul>
- <li>Sometimes there has been a genuine problem and the authority never
- received the request. It is worth telephoning the authority and politely
- checking that they received the request. It was sent to them by email.
- </li>
- <li>If they have not received it, the problem is most likely due to
- "spam filters". Refer the authority to the measures in the answer
- '<a href="/help/officers#spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!</a>'
- in the FOI officers section of this help.
- </li>
- <li>If you're still having no luck, then you can ask for an internal review,
- and then complain to the Information Commissioner about the authority.
- Read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
-</ul>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="not_satifised">What if I'm not satisfied with the response? <a href="#not_satifised">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in time,
-then read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="reuse">It says I can't re-use the information I got!<a href="#reuse">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>
-<p>Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the
-"<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051515">Re-Use of Public Sector
-Information Regulations 2005</a>", which at first glance implies you may not
-be able do anything with the information.
-</p>
-
-<p>You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
-quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
-information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
-allowed to do so. See <a href="/help/officers#copyright">our policy on copyright</a>.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="ico_help">Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making requests? <a href="#ico_help">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Have a look at the
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx">access to official information</a>
-pages on the Information Commissioner's website.</p>
-
-<p>If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
-the process is very similar. There are differences around time
-limits for compliance.
-See the <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1858&amp;sID=321">Scottish
-Information Commissioner's guidance</a> for details.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="data_protection">Can I request information about myself? <a href="#data_protection">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>No. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made under the Freedom of
-Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
-individual.</p>
-
-<p>If you would like to know what information a public
-authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
-private using Data Protection law. The leaflet "<a
-href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information</a>" (on the Information Commissioner's
-website) explains how to do this.</p>
-
-<p>If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
-unwittingly, in a request, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>
-immediately so we can remove it.</p>
-</dd>
-
-
-<dt id="private_requests">I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story) <a href="#private_requests">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All
-responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
-to read. </p>
-<p>You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
-make a request in private. If you're interested in buying a system which helps
-you manage FOI requests in secret, then <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="eir">Why can I only request information about the environment from some authorities? <a href="#eir">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Some public authorities, such as <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water">South East Water</a>,
-don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
-the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
-</p>
-
-<p>It's a very similar law, so you make a request
-to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
-difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
-that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
-means. It is quite broad.
-</p>
-
-<p>You can, of course, request environmental information from other
-authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
-authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
-(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="multiple">Can I make the same to request to lots of authorities, e.g. all councils? <a href="#multiple">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We ask you to first send a test version of your request to a few
-authorities. Their responses will help you improve the wording of your request,
-so that you get the best information when you send the request to all of
-the authorities. There is currently no automated system for sending the request
-to the other authorities, you must copy and paste it by hand.
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="offsite">I made a request off the site, how do I upload it to the archive?<a href="#offsite">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is an archive of requests made through the site,
-and does not try to be an archive of all FOI requests. We'll never support uploading
-other requests. For one thing, we wouldn't be able to verify that other
-responses actually came from the authority. If this really matters to you,
-you can always make the same request again via WhatDoTheyKnow.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="moderation">How do you moderate request annotations? <a href="#moderation">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help
-people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
-can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
-</p>
-<p>Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
-Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.</p>
-<dd>
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/privacy">your privacy</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/requesting.rhtml b/app/views/help/requesting.rhtml
index aa41121ce..dc70f3f89 100644
--- a/app/views/help/requesting.rhtml
+++ b/app/views/help/requesting.rhtml
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<% @title = "Bej kerkes" %>
+<% @title = "Making requests" %>
<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
diff --git a/app/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index aa41121ce..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,293 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Bej kerkes" %>
-
-<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
-
-<h1 id="making_requests"><%= @title %> <a href="#making_requests">#</a> </h1>
-<dl>
-
-<dt id="which_authority">I'm not sure which authority to make my request to, how can I find out? <a href="#which_authority">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
-who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
-<ul>
-<li>Browse or search WhatDoTheyKnow looking for similar requests to yours.</li>
-<li>When you've found an authority you think might have the information, use
-the "home page" link on the right hand side of their page to check what they do
-on their website.</li>
-<li>Contact the authority by phone or email to ask if they hold the kind of
-information you're after.</li>
-<li>Don't worry excessively about getting the right authority. If you get it
-wrong, they ought to advise you who to make the request to instead.
-</li>
-<li>If you've got a thorny case, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> for help.</li>
-</ul>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-
-<dt id="missing_body">You're missing the public authority that I want to request from! <a href="#missing_body">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with the name of the public authority and,
-if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
-</p>
-<p>If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
-to hear from you too.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="authorities">Why do you include some authorities that aren't formally subject to FOI?<a href="#authorities">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow lets you make requests for information to a range of
-organisations:</p>
-
-<ul>
- <li> Those formally subject to the FOI Act</li>
- <li> Those formally subject to the Environmental Regulations (a less well
- defined group)</li>
- <li> Those which voluntarily comply with the FOI Act</li>
- <li> Those which aren't subject to the Act but we think should be, on grounds
- such as them having significant public responsibilities.
- </li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
-scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
-to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="focused">Why must I keep my request focused?<a href="#focused">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>
-Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
-easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
-<i>not</i> include any of the following:
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>arguments about your cause</li>
-<li>statements that could defame or insult others</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>
-If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
-libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
-make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
-requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
-Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
-run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
-need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
-and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
-"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
-from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
-annotations after submitting the request).
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="fees">Does it cost me anything to make a request?<a href="#fees">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-
-<p>Making an FOI request is nearly always free.</p>
-
-<p>Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
-acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
-They hardly ever will actually charge a fee. If they do, they can only charge you if
-you have specifically agreed in advance to pay. <a
- href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/chargingafee.pdf">More
- details</a> from the Information Commissioner.
-</p>
-
-<p>Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
-of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
-public authorities). At this point you can refine your
-request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
-spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
-</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-
-
-<dt id="quickly_response">How quickly will I get a response? <a href="#quickly_response">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>By law, public authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to
-requests.
-</p>
-
-<p>Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
-20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
-or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
-(<a href="/help/officers#days">full details</a>).
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow will email you if you don't get a timely response. You can
-then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
-are breaking the law.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="deadline_extended">Deadline extended <a href="#deadline_extended">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>By law, public authorities must needs <strong>more time</strong> for request ... (TO DO)
-</p>
-
-
-</dd>
-<dt id="no_response">What if I never get a response?<a href="#no_response">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>There are several things you can do if you never get a response.</p>
-<ul>
- <li>Sometimes there has been a genuine problem and the authority never
- received the request. It is worth telephoning the authority and politely
- checking that they received the request. It was sent to them by email.
- </li>
- <li>If they have not received it, the problem is most likely due to
- "spam filters". Refer the authority to the measures in the answer
- '<a href="/help/officers#spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!</a>'
- in the FOI officers section of this help.
- </li>
- <li>If you're still having no luck, then you can ask for an internal review,
- and then complain to the Information Commissioner about the authority.
- Read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
-</ul>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="not_satifised">What if I'm not satisfied with the response? <a href="#not_satifised">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in time,
-then read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="reuse">It says I can't re-use the information I got!<a href="#reuse">#</a> </dt>
-<dd>
-<p>Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the
-"<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051515">Re-Use of Public Sector
-Information Regulations 2005</a>", which at first glance implies you may not
-be able do anything with the information.
-</p>
-
-<p>You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
-quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
-information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
-allowed to do so. See <a href="/help/officers#copyright">our policy on copyright</a>.</p>
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="ico_help">Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making requests? <a href="#ico_help">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Have a look at the
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx">access to official information</a>
-pages on the Information Commissioner's website.</p>
-
-<p>If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
-the process is very similar. There are differences around time
-limits for compliance.
-See the <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1858&amp;sID=321">Scottish
-Information Commissioner's guidance</a> for details.</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="data_protection">Can I request information about myself? <a href="#data_protection">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>No. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made under the Freedom of
-Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
-individual.</p>
-
-<p>If you would like to know what information a public
-authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
-private using Data Protection law. The leaflet "<a
-href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information</a>" (on the Information Commissioner's
-website) explains how to do this.</p>
-
-<p>If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
-unwittingly, in a request, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>
-immediately so we can remove it.</p>
-</dd>
-
-
-<dt id="private_requests">I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story) <a href="#private_requests">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All
-responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
-to read. </p>
-<p>You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
-make a request in private. If you're interested in buying a system which helps
-you manage FOI requests in secret, then <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="eir">Why can I only request information about the environment from some authorities? <a href="#eir">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Some public authorities, such as <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water">South East Water</a>,
-don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
-the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
-</p>
-
-<p>It's a very similar law, so you make a request
-to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
-difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
-that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
-means. It is quite broad.
-</p>
-
-<p>You can, of course, request environmental information from other
-authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
-authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
-(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under.
-</p>
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="multiple">Can I make the same to request to lots of authorities, e.g. all councils? <a href="#multiple">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>We ask you to first send a test version of your request to a few
-authorities. Their responses will help you improve the wording of your request,
-so that you get the best information when you send the request to all of
-the authorities. There is currently no automated system for sending the request
-to the other authorities, you must copy and paste it by hand.
-
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="offsite">I made a request off the site, how do I upload it to the archive?<a href="#offsite">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is an archive of requests made through the site,
-and does not try to be an archive of all FOI requests. We'll never support uploading
-other requests. For one thing, we wouldn't be able to verify that other
-responses actually came from the authority. If this really matters to you,
-you can always make the same request again via WhatDoTheyKnow.
-</dd>
-
-<dt id="moderation">How do you moderate request annotations? <a href="#moderation">#</a> </dt>
-
-<dd>
-<p>Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help
-people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
-can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
-</p>
-<p>Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
-Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.</p>
-<dd>
-
-</dl>
-
-<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/privacy">your privacy</a> --&gt;
-
-<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml b/app/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 432c00f2e..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Unhappy about a Freedom of Information request?" %>
-
-
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
-<h1>Unhappy about the response you got
-to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
-</h1>
-<% else %>
-<h1>Unhappy about the response you got?</h1>
-<% end %>
-
-<p>If ...</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>You didn't get a reply within 20 working days</li>
-<li>You did not get all of the information that you requested <strong>or</strong></li>
-<li>Your request was refused, but without a reason valid under the law</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>... you can</p>
-
-<ol>
-<li>Ask for an <strong>internal review</strong> at the public authority.</li>
-<li>If that doesn't help, complain to the <strong>Information Commissioner</strong>.</li>
-<li>Either way, also <strong>use other means</strong> to answer your question.</li>
-</ol>
-
-<h1 id="internal_review">1. Asking for an internal review <a class="hover_a" href="#internal_review">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
- Choose <%= link_to "request an internal review", show_response_no_followup_url(:id => @info_request.id, :incoming_message_id => nil) + "?internal_review=1#followup" %> and then write a message asking the authority to review your request.
-<% else %>
- At the bottom of the relevant request page on WhatDoTheyKnow choose
- "request an internal review". Then write a message asking for an internal
- review of your request. You may want to include a link to the
- request page, to make it clear which request you are talking about.
-<% end %>
-</p>
-
-<p>Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days
-then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take
-longer than 40 working days (see this
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf">good
-practice guide</a>).
-You will then either get the information that
-you originally requested, or you will be told that the review upholds the
-original decision.
-</p>
-
-<h1 id="complaining">2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner <a class="hover_a" href="#complaining">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review,
-then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom_of_information.aspx">Complaints about Freedom of Information</a>
-on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish
-authority, then <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourRights/HowToAppeal/Appeal.asp">appeal
-to the Scottish Information Commissioner</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>To make it easier to send the relevant information to the
-Information Commissioner, either
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
- include a link to your request
- <strong><%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %></strong>
-<% else %>
- include a link to your request on WhatDoTheyKnow
-<% end %>
-in your complaint or print out the whole page of your request and all attachments.
-</p>
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow has no special facilities for handling a request at this stage - it
-passes into the Information Commissioner's system. You can leave annotations on your
-request keeping people informed of progress.</p>
-
-<p>A warning. There is a backlog of work at the Information Commissioner, and
-it can take literally years to get resolution from them. If you reach this point,
-you should accept that you won't get the information quickly by this means. Maybe
-you want to help the fight to improve Freedom of Information, or maybe
-getting the information slowly is still worthwhile. You can also try and
-get the information by <strong>other means...</strong></p>
-
-<h1 id="other_means">3. Using other means to answer your question <a class="hover_a" href="#other_means">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>You can try persuing your problem or your research in other ways.
-
-<ul>
-<li>Make a <strong>new FOI request</strong> for summary information, or for
-documentation relating indirectly to matters in your refused request.
-<a href="/help/contact">Ask us for ideas</a> if you're stuck.</li>
-<li>If any <strong>other public authorities</strong> or publicly owned companies are involved,
-then make FOI requests to them.</li>
-<li>Write to <strong>your MP</strong> or other politician using <a
-href="http://www.writetothem.com">WriteToThem</a> and ask for their help
-finding the answer. MPs can write directly to ministers or departments, and
-can ask written questions in the House of Commons. Councillors in local authorities
-can talk directly to council officers.</li>
-<li>Ask <strong>other researchers</strong> who are interested in a similar
-issue to yours for ideas. You can sometimes find them by browsing this site;
-contact any registered user from their page. There may be an Internet
-forum or group that they hang out in. If it is a local matter, use <a
-href="http://www.groupsnearyou.com">GroupsNearYou</a> to find such a
-forum.</li>
-<li><strong>Start a pledge</strong> on <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com">PledgeBank</a> to get
-others to act together with you. For example, you could arrange a meeting with
-staff from the authority. Or you could form a small local campaigns group.
-</ul>
-
-
-
diff --git a/app/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml b/app/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml
deleted file mode 100644
index 432c00f2e..000000000
--- a/app/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
-<% @title = "Unhappy about a Freedom of Information request?" %>
-
-
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
-<h1>Unhappy about the response you got
-to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
-</h1>
-<% else %>
-<h1>Unhappy about the response you got?</h1>
-<% end %>
-
-<p>If ...</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li>You didn't get a reply within 20 working days</li>
-<li>You did not get all of the information that you requested <strong>or</strong></li>
-<li>Your request was refused, but without a reason valid under the law</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>... you can</p>
-
-<ol>
-<li>Ask for an <strong>internal review</strong> at the public authority.</li>
-<li>If that doesn't help, complain to the <strong>Information Commissioner</strong>.</li>
-<li>Either way, also <strong>use other means</strong> to answer your question.</li>
-</ol>
-
-<h1 id="internal_review">1. Asking for an internal review <a class="hover_a" href="#internal_review">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
- Choose <%= link_to "request an internal review", show_response_no_followup_url(:id => @info_request.id, :incoming_message_id => nil) + "?internal_review=1#followup" %> and then write a message asking the authority to review your request.
-<% else %>
- At the bottom of the relevant request page on WhatDoTheyKnow choose
- "request an internal review". Then write a message asking for an internal
- review of your request. You may want to include a link to the
- request page, to make it clear which request you are talking about.
-<% end %>
-</p>
-
-<p>Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days
-then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take
-longer than 40 working days (see this
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf">good
-practice guide</a>).
-You will then either get the information that
-you originally requested, or you will be told that the review upholds the
-original decision.
-</p>
-
-<h1 id="complaining">2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner <a class="hover_a" href="#complaining">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review,
-then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read
-<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom_of_information.aspx">Complaints about Freedom of Information</a>
-on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish
-authority, then <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourRights/HowToAppeal/Appeal.asp">appeal
-to the Scottish Information Commissioner</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>To make it easier to send the relevant information to the
-Information Commissioner, either
-<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
- include a link to your request
- <strong><%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %></strong>
-<% else %>
- include a link to your request on WhatDoTheyKnow
-<% end %>
-in your complaint or print out the whole page of your request and all attachments.
-</p>
-
-<p>WhatDoTheyKnow has no special facilities for handling a request at this stage - it
-passes into the Information Commissioner's system. You can leave annotations on your
-request keeping people informed of progress.</p>
-
-<p>A warning. There is a backlog of work at the Information Commissioner, and
-it can take literally years to get resolution from them. If you reach this point,
-you should accept that you won't get the information quickly by this means. Maybe
-you want to help the fight to improve Freedom of Information, or maybe
-getting the information slowly is still worthwhile. You can also try and
-get the information by <strong>other means...</strong></p>
-
-<h1 id="other_means">3. Using other means to answer your question <a class="hover_a" href="#other_means">#</a> </h1>
-
-<p>You can try persuing your problem or your research in other ways.
-
-<ul>
-<li>Make a <strong>new FOI request</strong> for summary information, or for
-documentation relating indirectly to matters in your refused request.
-<a href="/help/contact">Ask us for ideas</a> if you're stuck.</li>
-<li>If any <strong>other public authorities</strong> or publicly owned companies are involved,
-then make FOI requests to them.</li>
-<li>Write to <strong>your MP</strong> or other politician using <a
-href="http://www.writetothem.com">WriteToThem</a> and ask for their help
-finding the answer. MPs can write directly to ministers or departments, and
-can ask written questions in the House of Commons. Councillors in local authorities
-can talk directly to council officers.</li>
-<li>Ask <strong>other researchers</strong> who are interested in a similar
-issue to yours for ideas. You can sometimes find them by browsing this site;
-contact any registered user from their page. There may be an Internet
-forum or group that they hang out in. If it is a local matter, use <a
-href="http://www.groupsnearyou.com">GroupsNearYou</a> to find such a
-forum.</li>
-<li><strong>Start a pledge</strong> on <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com">PledgeBank</a> to get
-others to act together with you. For example, you could arrange a meeting with
-staff from the authority. Or you could form a small local campaigns group.
-</ul>
-
-
-