aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/app/views/help/officers.rhtml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'app/views/help/officers.rhtml')
-rw-r--r--app/views/help/officers.rhtml38
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/app/views/help/officers.rhtml b/app/views/help/officers.rhtml
index 3defec62f..b13e225fe 100644
--- a/app/views/help/officers.rhtml
+++ b/app/views/help/officers.rhtml
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@
</p>
<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
You might also like to read the <a
- href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
+ href="<%= help_about_path %>">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
any requests made using the site.
<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
- thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
+ thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="<%= help_contact_path %>">get in touch</a>.
</p>
</dd>
@@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
- href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
+ href="<%= help_contact_path %>">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
use.</p>
<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
- sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
+ sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
- If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
+ If you <a href="<%= help_contact_path %>">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
up what happened to the message.
</p>
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
</li>
</ul>
- <p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
+ <p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
@@ -173,14 +173,14 @@
extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>. Information
Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
complex" cases
- (<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
+ (<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
- exceeded.
+ exceeded.
</p>
<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
- Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
+ Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
to answer. WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
</p>
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
- of the UK Act through Parliament).
+ of the UK Act through Parliament).
</p>
</dd>
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
- the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
+ the bottom of the request's page. <a href="<%= help_contact_path %>">Contact us</a> if it
is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
</dd>
@@ -207,17 +207,17 @@
<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
- circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
+ circumstances, see our <a href="<%= help_privacy_path(:anchor => 'takedown') %>">take down policy</a>.
</dd>
<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
- responses to requests. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
- missed one.
+ responses to requests. Please <a href="<%= help_contact_path %>">contact us</a> if we've
+ missed one.
For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
- href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
+ href="<%= help_contact_path %>">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
form in an annotation.
</dd>
@@ -225,10 +225,10 @@
<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
- world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
+ world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
- copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
+ copyright, you may <a href="<%= help_contact_path %>">contact us</a> and ask us
to take it down. However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
</dd>
@@ -238,8 +238,8 @@
</dl>
- <p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
- <br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
+ <p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="<%= help_about_path %>">the introduction</a> --&gt;
+ <br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="<%= help_credits_path %>">credits</a> or the <a href="<%= help_api_path %>">programmers API</a> --&gt;
<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
</div>