diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'todo.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | todo.txt | 47 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 28 deletions
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -Test data for Tony - Internal review =============== @@ -12,34 +10,34 @@ don't offer it again. Clock for internal review The Information Commissioner has issued a "Good Practice Guidance" document: http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf - Reviews are meant to be carried out "as quickly as possible", and they - suggest 20 working days as a reasonable limit. In exceptional cases they - accept it may take longer, but recommend informing the requester in such - a case as to why. They do not believe it should ever take longer than 40 - days. + 20 days is late + 40 days max. Fix up the text: "The internal review should take 2-3 weeks for simple cases, and up to 6 weeks even for complex reviews." Awaiting internal review overdue state? -Search for text "internal review" in followups and add warning if they aren't -using the internal review mode. - -Make the text of internal review have a bit that you have to edit. - -Tips on using the law: -- You can go up and down between local and national - ask local places what their policy is, and hwo they are implementing it. Ask national things what odcuments set local policies. Next ==== -Watch these requests that are in internal review state or have been: - http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/communications_from_home_office - http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/community_justice_centre_sentenc +Write code to make sure the Return-Path is never foi@sandwich.org.uk (even if the + Rails code breaks for Sendmail case in future botched Rails upgrades :) + + +Later +===== + +Test data dumper that removes sensitive data, but lets trusted people play with +whole database on their own machine without risk of compromise (for Tony) +- can avoid rebuilding emails, attachments etc. sanitized provided we don't +mind leaking out email address ot requests etc. to the trusted person (in contrast +can easily totally remove private emails in the user table) -Gone to information commissioner - http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/local_government_ombudsman_2 - appeal to infocom - http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/please_submit_the_surveyors_repo -Clear out all the need admin attention requests +Tips on using the law: +- You can go up and down between local and national - ask local places what their policy is, and hwo they are implementing it. Ask national things what odcuments set local policies. + +Search for text "internal review" in followups and add warning if they aren't +using the internal review mode. CSS / design things - Icon for internal_review @@ -50,13 +48,6 @@ CSS / design things - Improve CSS on IE7 for large images in docs http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/3289/response/7810/attach/html/3/20081023ReplyLetter.pdf.html -Write code to make sure the Return-Path is never foi@sandwich.org.uk (even if the - Rails code breaks for Sendmail case in future botched Rails upgrades :) - - -Later -===== - Let requesters change status to anything at any point - using same interface let admin users set things to internal review more easily (currently have to go to admin interface, as isn't on main describe |