From 83a77cd901cb7213e4b6c3b08d2037b7ba4cb15c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: skenaja Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:15:59 +0000 Subject: fixed spelling --- app/views/help/about.rhtml | 6 +++--- app/views/help/unhappy.rhtml | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'app') diff --git a/app/views/help/about.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.rhtml index 9a3300f08..7a34c0188 100644 --- a/app/views/help/about.rhtml +++ b/app/views/help/about.rhtml @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ then read our page 'Unhappy about the response you got?<

Have a look at the access to official information -pages on the Information Commisioner's website.

+pages on the Information Commissioner's website.

If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority, the process is very similar. There are differences around time @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ individual.

If you would like to know what information a public authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in private using Data Protection law. The leaflet "How to access your information" (on the Information Commisioner's +href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information" (on the Information Commissioner's website) explains how to do this.

If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ used a pseudonym.

Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the -Information Commisioner later about the handling of your request. +Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.

There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.

diff --git a/app/views/help/unhappy.rhtml b/app/views/help/unhappy.rhtml index 02a0d862b..cd302a81a 100644 --- a/app/views/help/unhappy.rhtml +++ b/app/views/help/unhappy.rhtml @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
  1. Ask for an internal review at the public authority.
  2. -
  3. If that doesn't help, complain to the Information Commisioner.
  4. +
  5. If that doesn't help, complain to the Information Commissioner.
  6. Either way, also use other means to answer your question.
@@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ original decision.

2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner #

If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review, -then you can complain to the Information Commisioner. To do this read +then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read Complaints about Freedom of Information -on the Information Commisioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish +on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish authority, then appeal to the Scottish Information Commissioner.

To make it easier to send the relevant information to the -Information Commisioner, either +Information Commissioner, either <% if !@info_request.nil? %> include a link to your request <%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %> -- cgit v1.2.3