1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml b/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
index 9d2bfd2..c1bc934 100644
--- a/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
+++ b/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
@@ -9,17 +9,17 @@
 
 <dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
 
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
+<dd><p><%= site_name %> is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
 of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
 
-<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
+<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using <%= site_name %>. You can
 simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
 The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
 the Internet.
 </p>
 <p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
 You might also like to read the <a
-href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
+href="/help/about">introduction to <%= site_name %></a> to find out more about what
 the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
 site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
 any requests made using the site.
@@ -53,23 +53,23 @@ find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
 
 <dd>Yes it is. This
 <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
-in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+in the context of requests made via <%= site_name %>.
 </dd>
 
 <dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
 
-<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
+<dd><p><%= site_name %> is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
 behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
 <p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
 different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
 making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
-via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
+via <%= site_name %>. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
 for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
 <p>If that isn't enough for you, the
 <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
 </dd>
 
-<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
+<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on <%= site_name %>, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
 
 <dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
 the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
 taking the extra time to do.
 </p>
 
-<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
+<p>That said, <%= site_name %> does show the maximum legal deadline
 for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
 
 <ul>
@@ -148,13 +148,13 @@ one case which is not normal, see the next question about
 <a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
 </p>
 
-<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
+<p>Schools are also a special case, which <%= site_name %> displays differently.
 </p>
 
 <ul>
 <li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
 disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
-whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
+whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). <%= site_name %> indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
 during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
 </li>
 </ul>
@@ -174,19 +174,19 @@ extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>.  Information
 Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
 complex" cases
 (<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>). 
-WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
+<%= site_name %> doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
 phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
 exceeded. 
 </p>
 
 <p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
 Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong> 
-to answer.  WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
+to answer.  <%= site_name %> displays requests which are overdue by that much
 with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
 </p>
 
 <p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
-interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
+interest extension. <%= site_name %> would like to see the law changed to either
 remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
 of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
 href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted