aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/views/help/officers.rhtml')
-rw-r--r--lib/views/help/officers.rhtml18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml b/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
index 1fddb5d..0072f1e 100644
--- a/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
+++ b/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
use.</p>
<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
-sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
-any email from <strong>@<%= MySociety::Config.get('INCOMING_EMAIL_DOMAIN') %></strong>.
+sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
+any email from <strong>@<%= MySociety::Config.get('INCOMING_EMAIL_DOMAIN', 'localhost') %></strong>.
If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
up what happened to the message.
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
</li>
</ul>
-<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
+<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>.
Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
@@ -173,14 +173,14 @@ Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>. Information
Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
complex" cases
-(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
+(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>).
<%= site_name %> doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
-exceeded.
+exceeded.
</p>
<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
-Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
+Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong>
to answer. <%= site_name %> displays requests which are overdue by that much
with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
</p>
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
-of the UK Act through Parliament).
+of the UK Act through Parliament).
</p>
</dd>
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
responses to requests. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
-missed one.
+missed one.
For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ form in an annotation.
<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
-world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
+world can request the same document and get a copy of it.
If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us