From b67d819d3cedc999bd03e6b07eaf0a084745b3e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Longair If your question isn't answered here, or you just wanted to let us know
+ something about the site, contact us.
+ If your question isn't answered here, or you just wanted to let us know
- something about the site, contact us.
- Esta sito tu aidare a faire los requestio Esta sito tu aidare a faire los requestio This is a custom "about" page This is a custom "about" page This page explains how programmers can make other websites and software
+interact with <%= site_name %> via an "API".
+ <%= site_name %> does not have a full API yet, but we are gradually adding
+lots of things that are similar in use to an API as they are requested.
+ To encourage your users to make links to a particular public authority, use URLs of the form
+<%= link_to new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") , new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") %>.
+These are the parameters you can add to those URLs, either in the URL or from a form.
+
+ There are Atom feeds on most pages which list FOI requests, which you can
+use to get updates and links in XML format. Find the URL of the Atom feed in
+one of these ways:
+ In particular, even complicated search queries have Atom feeds.
+You can do all sorts of things with them, such as query by authority, by file
+type, by date range, or by status. See the advanced search
+tips for details.
+
+ Quite a few pages have JSON versions, which let you download information about
+objects in a structured form. Find them by:
+ Requests, users and authorities all have JSON versions containing basic
+information about them. Every Atom feed has a JSON equivalent, containing
+information about the list of events in the feed.
+
+A spreadsheet file listing every body in <%= site_name %> is available:
+<%= link_to "all-authorities.csv", all_public_bodies_csv_url() %>
+ Please contact us if you need an API feature that isn't there yet. It's
+very much a work in progress, and we do add things when people ask us to. This page explains how programmers can make other websites and software
-interact with <%= site_name %> via an "API".
- <%= site_name %> does not have a full API yet, but we are gradually adding
-lots of things that are similar in use to an API as they are requested.
- To encourage your users to make links to a particular public authority, use URLs of the form
-<%= link_to new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") , new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") %>.
-These are the parameters you can add to those URLs, either in the URL or from a form.
-
- There are Atom feeds on most pages which list FOI requests, which you can
-use to get updates and links in XML format. Find the URL of the Atom feed in
-one of these ways:
- In particular, even complicated search queries have Atom feeds.
-You can do all sorts of things with them, such as query by authority, by file
-type, by date range, or by status. See the advanced search
-tips for details.
-
- Quite a few pages have JSON versions, which let you download information about
-objects in a structured form. Find them by:
- Requests, users and authorities all have JSON versions containing basic
-information about them. Every Atom feed has a JSON equivalent, containing
-information about the list of events in the feed.
-
-A spreadsheet file listing every body in <%= site_name %> is available:
-<%= link_to "all-authorities.csv", all_public_bodies_csv_url() %>
- Please contact us if you need an API feature that isn't there yet. It's
-very much a work in progress, and we do add things when people ask us to. Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers. Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers. This is a custom "help out" page, showing how you can add new pages to Alaveteli from within a theme. This is a custom "help out" page, showing how you can add new pages to Alaveteli from within a theme. <%= site_name %> is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
+of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses. The FOI request you received was made by someone using <%= site_name %>. You can
+simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
+The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
+the Internet.
+ If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
+You might also like to read the introduction to <%= site_name %> to find out more about what
+the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
+site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
+any requests made using the site.
+
+ Finally, we welcome comments and
+thoughts from FOI officers, please get in touch.
+ <%= site_name %> is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
+behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
+different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
+making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
+via <%= site_name %>. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
+for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. If that isn't enough for you, the
+letter from the ICO to Rother District Council gives some guidance on the matter. If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
+the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
+appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
+email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. Contact us if there is a better address we can
+use. Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
+"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
+sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
+any email from @<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %>.
+If you ask us we will resend any request,
+and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
+up what happened to the message.
+ Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
+needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
+each request page.
+ The Freedom of Information Act says: A public authority must comply with section 1(1) promptly and
+in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
+receipt. The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
+the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
+here is that the law says authorities must respond promptly. If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
+process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
+sentence or two saying what is happening. FOI officers often have to do a lot of hard work to answer
+requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
+to have more of that complexity visible. Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
+must respond promptly to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
+it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
+taking the extra time to do.
+ That said, <%= site_name %> does show the maximum legal deadline
+for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it. The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
+Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
+one case which is not normal, see the next question about
+public interest test time extensions.
+ Schools are also a special case, which <%= site_name %> displays differently.
+ If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the detailed ICO guidance.
+Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
+promptly. That's really what matters. The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
+extension when applying a public interest test. Information
+Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
+complex" cases
+(FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4).
+<%= site_name %> doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
+phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
+exceeded.
+ The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
+Freedom of Information request should take more than 40 working days
+to answer. <%= site_name %> displays requests which are overdue by that much
+with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
+ The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
+interest extension. <%= site_name %> would like to see the law changed to either
+remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
+of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords voted
+to remove provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
+of the UK Act through Parliament).
+ To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
+responses to requests. Please contact us if we've
+missed one.
+For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs. If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please get in touch with us. Occasionally, an email address
+forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
+form in an annotation.
+ If you haven't already, read the introduction -->
+ <%= site_name %> is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
-of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses. The FOI request you received was made by someone using <%= site_name %>. You can
-simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
-The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
-the Internet.
- If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
-You might also like to read the introduction to <%= site_name %> to find out more about what
-the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
-site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
-any requests made using the site.
-
- Finally, we welcome comments and
-thoughts from FOI officers, please get in touch.
- <%= site_name %> is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
-behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
-different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
-making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
-via <%= site_name %>. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
-for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. If that isn't enough for you, the
-letter from the ICO to Rother District Council gives some guidance on the matter. If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
-the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
-appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
-email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. Contact us if there is a better address we can
-use. Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
-"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
-sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist"
-any email from @<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %>.
-If you ask us we will resend any request,
-and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
-up what happened to the message.
- Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
-needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
-each request page.
- The Freedom of Information Act says: A public authority must comply with section 1(1) promptly and
-in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
-receipt. The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
-the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
-here is that the law says authorities must respond promptly. If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
-process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
-sentence or two saying what is happening. FOI officers often have to do a lot of hard work to answer
-requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
-to have more of that complexity visible. Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
-must respond promptly to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
-it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
-taking the extra time to do.
- That said, <%= site_name %> does show the maximum legal deadline
-for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it. The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
-Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
-one case which is not normal, see the next question about
-public interest test time extensions.
- Schools are also a special case, which <%= site_name %> displays differently.
- If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the detailed ICO guidance.
-Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
-promptly. That's really what matters. The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
-extension when applying a public interest test. Information
-Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
-complex" cases
-(FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4).
-<%= site_name %> doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
-phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
-exceeded.
- The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
-Freedom of Information request should take more than 40 working days
-to answer. <%= site_name %> displays requests which are overdue by that much
-with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
- The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
-interest extension. <%= site_name %> would like to see the law changed to either
-remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
-of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords voted
-to remove provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
-of the UK Act through Parliament).
- To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
-responses to requests. Please contact us if we've
-missed one.
-For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs. If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please get in touch with us. Occasionally, an email address
-forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
-form in an annotation.
- If you haven't already, read the introduction -->
- We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
+or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
+request to. They only get to see an email address
+@<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %> which is specific to that request. If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
+email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen. We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
+make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
+requests (more details).
+
+Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
+It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
+writes the response to your request. Using your real name also helps people
+get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you.
+ By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
+Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
+to publish your full name.
+ Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
+guidance from the Information Commissioner (January 2009).
+ However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
+authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
+You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
+used a pseudonym. Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
+pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
+Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
+ There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym. Please do not try to impersonate someone else. If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
+that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence",
+and that the email address you are using is sufficient.
+
+The Ministry of Justice has guidance
+on this –
+"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
+transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable
+... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
+address should be treated as the return address."
+
+ As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's
+Hints for Practitioners say
+"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."
+ If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
+they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
+to scan in the documents for you. You can even offer to gift them a scanner, which in that particular case
+embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already. If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
+in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
+give you an email address to use for that purpose. <%= site_name %> is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
+Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
+a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
+reason, we will not delete requests.
+ Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
+on the website, see the next question.
+Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
+ If you're worried about this before you make your request,
+see the section on pseudonyms. If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
+us to remove or hide, then please let us know.
+Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
+where it appears on the site. If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
+posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
+requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
+concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
+pointing out anything they see. We consider that there is a strong public interest in
+retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
+remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
+a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
+safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
+such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
+line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
+which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
+been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website. For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
+whether information should be removed.
+ Section 32
+of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
+publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
+as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
+that authorities resend these with the personal information removed. Learn more from the help for FOI officers -->
+
+ We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
-or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
-request to. They only get to see an email address
-@<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %> which is specific to that request. If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
-email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen. We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
-make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
-requests (more details).
-
-Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
-It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
-writes the response to your request. Using your real name also helps people
-get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you.
- By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
-Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
-to publish your full name.
- Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
-guidance from the Information Commissioner (January 2009).
- However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
-authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
-You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
-used a pseudonym. Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
-pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
-Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
- There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym. Please do not try to impersonate someone else. If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
-that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence",
-and that the email address you are using is sufficient.
-
-The Ministry of Justice has guidance
-on this –
-"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
-transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable
-... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
-address should be treated as the return address."
-
- As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's
-Hints for Practitioners say
-"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."
- If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
-they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
-to scan in the documents for you. You can even offer to gift them a scanner, which in that particular case
-embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already. If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
-in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
-give you an email address to use for that purpose. <%= site_name %> is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
-Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
-a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
-reason, we will not delete requests.
- Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
-on the website, see the next question.
-Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
- If you're worried about this before you make your request,
-see the section on pseudonyms. If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
-us to remove or hide, then please let us know.
-Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
-where it appears on the site. If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
-posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
-requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
-concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
-pointing out anything they see. We consider that there is a strong public interest in
-retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
-remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
-a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
-safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
-such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
-line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
-which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
-been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website. For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
-whether information should be removed.
- Section 32
-of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
-publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
-as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
-that authorities resend these with the personal information removed. Learn more from the help for FOI officers -->
-
- It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
+who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
+ Please contact us with the name of the public authority and,
+if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
+ If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
+to hear from you too.
+ <%= site_name %> lets you make requests for information to a range of
+organisations: In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
+scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
+to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
+
+Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
+easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
+not include any of the following:
+
+If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
+libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
+make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
+requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
+
+If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
+Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
+run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
+need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
+and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
+"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
+from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
+annotations after submitting the request).
+ Making an FOI request is nearly always free. Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
+acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
+They hardly ever will actually charge a fee. If they do, they can only charge you if
+you have specifically agreed in advance to pay. More
+ details from the Information Commissioner.
+ Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
+of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
+public authorities). At this point you can refine your
+request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
+spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
+ By law, public authorities must respond promptly to
+requests.
+ Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
+20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
+or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
+(full details).
+
+ <%= site_name %> will email you if you don't get a timely response. You can
+then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
+are breaking the law. There are several things you can do if you never get a response. Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the
+"Re-Use of Public Sector
+Information Regulations 2005", which at first glance implies you may not
+be able do anything with the information.
+ You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
+quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
+information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
+allowed to do so. See our policy on copyright. Have a look at the
+access to official information
+pages on the Information Commissioner's website. If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
+the process is very similar. There are differences around time
+limits for compliance.
+See the Scottish
+Information Commissioner's guidance for details. No. Requests made using <%= site_name %> are public, made under the Freedom of
+Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
+individual. If you would like to know what information a public
+authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
+private using Data Protection law. The leaflet "How to access your information" (on the Information Commissioner's
+website) explains how to do this. If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
+unwittingly, in a request, please contact us
+immediately so we can remove it. <%= site_name %> is currently only designed for public requests. All
+responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
+to read. You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
+make a request in private. If you're interested in buying a system which helps
+you manage FOI requests in secret, then contact us.
+ Some public authorities, such as South East Water,
+don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
+the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
+ It's a very similar law, so you make a request
+to them using <%= site_name %> in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
+difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
+that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
+means. It is quite broad.
+ You can, of course, request environmental information from other
+authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
+authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
+(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under.
+ Annotations on <%= site_name %> are to help
+people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
+can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
+ Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
+Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere. Next, read about your privacy -->
+
+ It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
-who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
- Please contact us with the name of the public authority and,
-if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
- If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
-to hear from you too.
- <%= site_name %> lets you make requests for information to a range of
-organisations: In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
-scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
-to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
-
-Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
-easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
-not include any of the following:
-
-If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
-libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
-make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
-requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
-
-If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
-Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
-run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
-need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
-and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
-"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
-from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
-annotations after submitting the request).
- Making an FOI request is nearly always free. Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
-acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
-They hardly ever will actually charge a fee. If they do, they can only charge you if
-you have specifically agreed in advance to pay. More
- details from the Information Commissioner.
- Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
-of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
-public authorities). At this point you can refine your
-request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
-spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
- By law, public authorities must respond promptly to
-requests.
- Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
-20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
-or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
-(full details).
-
- <%= site_name %> will email you if you don't get a timely response. You can
-then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
-are breaking the law. There are several things you can do if you never get a response. Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the
-"Re-Use of Public Sector
-Information Regulations 2005", which at first glance implies you may not
-be able do anything with the information.
- You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
-quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
-information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
-allowed to do so. See our policy on copyright. Have a look at the
-access to official information
-pages on the Information Commissioner's website. If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
-the process is very similar. There are differences around time
-limits for compliance.
-See the Scottish
-Information Commissioner's guidance for details. No. Requests made using <%= site_name %> are public, made under the Freedom of
-Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
-individual. If you would like to know what information a public
-authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
-private using Data Protection law. The leaflet "How to access your information" (on the Information Commissioner's
-website) explains how to do this. If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
-unwittingly, in a request, please contact us
-immediately so we can remove it. <%= site_name %> is currently only designed for public requests. All
-responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
-to read. You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
-make a request in private. If you're interested in buying a system which helps
-you manage FOI requests in secret, then contact us.
- Some public authorities, such as South East Water,
-don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
-the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
- It's a very similar law, so you make a request
-to them using <%= site_name %> in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
-difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
-that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
-means. It is quite broad.
- You can, of course, request environmental information from other
-authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
-authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
-(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under.
- Annotations on <%= site_name %> are to help
-people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
-can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
- Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
-Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere. Next, read about your privacy -->
-
-Help pages
+
+
+
+ Contact us
+ Help pages
-
-
-
- Contact us
- ¡Bonjiorno amis!
+ ¡Bonjiorno amis!
- Introduction to <%= site_name %> #
Introduction to <%= site_name %> #
<%=@title %>
+
+ Introduction
+
+
+
+ 1. Linking to new requests
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ 2. RSS (actually, Atom) feeds
+
+
+
+
+ RSS feed links.
+
+ 3. JSON structured data
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ 4. Spreadsheet of all authorities
+
+
+
+<%=@title %>
-
- Introduction
-
-
-
- 1. Linking to new requests
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2. RSS (actually, Atom) feeds
-
-
-
-
- RSS feed links.
-
- 3. JSON structured data
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4. Spreadsheet of all authorities
-
-
-
-<%= @title%> #
+
+
+
+
+
+You're all stars.
+
+
+<%= @title%> #
-
-
-
-
-
-You're all stars.
-
-
-Help us!
+
+ Help us!
-
- <%= @title %> #
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Otherwise, the credits or the programmers API -->
+
+<%= @title %> #
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Otherwise, the credits or the programmers API -->
-
-<%= @title %> #
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<%= @title %> #
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<%= @title %> #
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<%= @title %> #
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by "spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist" -any email from @<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %>. +any email from @<%= AlaveteliConfiguration::incoming_email_domain %>. If you ask us we will resend any request, and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase up what happened to the message. diff --git a/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb b/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb index 7102fc8..6f190ee 100644 --- a/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb +++ b/lib/views/help/privacy.html.erb @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law, or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a request to. They only get to see an email address -@<%= Configuration::incoming_email_domain %> which is specific to that request.
+@<%= AlaveteliConfiguration::incoming_email_domain %> which is specific to that request.If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.