added alaveteli theme

36 files changed, 3712 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/MIT-LICENSE b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/MIT-LICENSE
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a6ab3396c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/MIT-LICENSE
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Copyright (c) 2011 Seb Bacon
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
+a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
+"Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
+without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
+distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
+permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
+the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
+included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
+EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
+MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
+NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE
+LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
+OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
+WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/README b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/README
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c82de19e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/README
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Alavetelitheme
+==============
+
+This is a "hello world" type theme package for Alaveteli.
+
+The intention is to support simple overlaying of templates and
+resources without the need to touch the core Alaveteli software.
+
+Typical usage should be limited to:
+
+ * Putting CSS-based customisations in lib/views/general/custom_css.rhtml
+
+ * Creating your own versions of non-functional pages (like "about
+   us", at lib/views/help/about.rhtml -- and/or localised versions at
+   lib/views/help/about.es.rhtml)
+
+To install::
+ 
+  ./script/plugin install git://github.com/sebbacon/alavetelitheme.git
+
+Look in the lib/ folder of the plugin to see how the overrides happen.
+
+Copyright (c) 2011 mySociety, released under the MIT license
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/Rakefile b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/Rakefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e69de29bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/Rakefile
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/init.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/init.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0014c6283
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/init.rb
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+require "alavetelitheme.rb"
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/install.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/install.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f7732d379
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/install.rb
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# Install hook code here
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/alavetelitheme.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/alavetelitheme.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fa2749c33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/alavetelitheme.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+class ActionController::Base
+    before_filter :set_view_paths
+
+    def set_view_paths         
+        self.prepend_view_path File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "views")
+    end
+end
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/general/custom_css.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/general/custom_css.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..20e4a068b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/general/custom_css.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+body{
+	background: #eeeeee;
+}	
+#header #tagline {
+ color: green;
+}
+
+h1 {
+ color: blue ! important;
+}
+#header h1 a {
+    background-image: url("../images/navimg/alaveteli-logo.png");
+	width: 212px;
+	height: 87px;
+	margin-left: 5px;
+}
+#header #tagline {
+ 	display: none; 
+}
+#header{
+	height: 87px;
+	position: static;
+	width:900px;
+}
+.entirebody{
+	width: 904px;
+	margin: 0 auto;
+    background: url("../images/navimg/entirebody.png") repeat-y left top;
+}
+#topnav {
+	background: url("../images/navimg/main-nav-bg.png") repeat-x left top;
+	height: 32px;
+	float: left;
+	margin-left: 5px;
+	width: 894px;
+	position: static;
+	z-index: 0;		
+}
+#frontpage_search{
+	background: none;
+}
+#topnav li a, #content a, #footer a{
+	color: #1f1f1f;
+}
+#topnav li a:visited, #content a:visited, #footer a:visited{
+	color: #585858;
+}
+#topnav li a:hover, #content a:hover, #footer a:hover{
+	color: #900000;
+}
+#navigation_search {
+	position: static;
+}
+.lang{
+	float: right;
+    width: 200px;
+}
+#wrapper{
+	padding: 0px;
+}
+ .entirebody:after {
+    clear:both;
+    content:".";
+    display:block;
+    height:0;
+    line-height:0;
+    visibility:hidden;
+}
+#content{
+padding:2em;
+padding-right:50px;
+}
+#content h1, #frontpage_search h1, .controller_request h1{
+color:#900000 !important;
+}
+div#blog_sidebar{
+margin-right:23px;
+}
+.blog_post{
+padding-right:25px;
+}
+#query{
+	background: url("../images/navimg/second-search.png") no-repeat left top;
+	border:none;
+	height:32px;
+	width:404px;
+	padding-left:5px;
+	padding-right:5px;
+	margin-bottom: 10px;
+}
+#navigation_search_form{
+	float: right;
+    margin-bottom: 10px;
+    margin-right: 15px;
+    margin-top: -10px;
+    width: 500px;
+}
+.controller_general h1{
+color:#900000;
+}
+#topnav ul{
+padding: 3px;
+}
+#logged_in_bar{
+ width: auto;
+ color:#1F1F1F;
+ margin-right: 10px;
+ margin-top: -3px;
+ }
+ #frontpage_search{
+ margin-top:-13px;
+ }
+ #frontpage_examples div#examples_0 li, #frontpage_examples div#examples_1 li{
+ margin-top:4px;
+ margin-bottom:3px;
+ }
+ #header #user_locale_switcher a, #header #user_locale_switcher span{
+ margin-left:5px;
+ margin-right:5px;
+ }
+  #header #user_locale_switcher a{
+  color: #1F1F1F;
+  }
+  #header #user_locale_switcher span{
+  color:#900000;
+  }
+  #topnav li a.active{
+    color:#900000;
+  }
+div#about_sidebar{
+  margin-bottom:20px;
+  }
+  div.correspondence{
+  width:600px;
+  }
+  #footer{
+  margin-left:5px;
+  width: 894px;
+  min-height:100px;
+  }
+  .after-footer{
+  	background: url("../images/after-footer.png") no-repeat left bottom;
+	height:10px;
+	width:904px;
+	float:left;
+  }
+  #logged_in_bar a, #logged_in_bar a:visited{
+  color:#900000;
+  }
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/_sidebar.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/_sidebar.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..99298e9c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/_sidebar.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<div id="about_sidebar">
+    <h1>Help pages</h1>
+    <ul>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Introduction", "/help/about" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Making requests", "/help/requesting" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Your privacy", "/help/privacy" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "FOI officers", "/help/officers" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Credits", "/help/credits" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Programmers API", "/help/api" %></li>
+        <li><%= link_to_unless_current "Advanced search", "/search" %></li>
+    </ul>
+
+    <h1 id="contact">Contact us</h1>
+    <p>If your question isn't answered here, or you just wanted to let us know
+    something about the site, <a href="/help/contact">contact&nbsp;us</a>.
+    </p>
+</div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..89a67d069
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+<% @title = "About" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="introduction">Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="purpose">What is WhatDoTheyKnow for? <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>To help you find out inside information about what the UK government
+is doing.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="premise">How does the site work? <a href="#premise">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
+write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your request
+to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically published on the
+website for you and anyone else to find and read.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_me">Why would I bother to do this? <a href="#whybother_me">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
+things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national defence. Some
+it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about how government
+works, the better able we are to make suggestions to improve the things that
+are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are done well.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_them">Why would the public authority bother to reply? <a href="#whybother_them">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. The response
+will either contain the information you want, or give a valid legal reason why
+it must be kept confidential.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="who">Who makes WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#who">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by <a href="http://www.mysociety.org">mySociety</a>,
+and was initially <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/">funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust</a>. mySociety is a project of the
+registered charity <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>.
+If you like what we're doing, then you can
+<a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="updates">How can I keep up with news about WhatDoTheyKnow?<a href="#updates">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>We have a <a href="/blog">blog</a> and a <a href="http://www.twitter.com/whatdotheyknow">twitter feed</a>.
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/requesting">making requests</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.es.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.es.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dc6079cd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.es.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<% @title = "Sobre" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1>¡Bonjiorno amis!</h1>
+
+<p>Esta sito tu aidare a faire los requesti a la governmenti Seblano</p>
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..85a20ba3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+<% @title = "Rreth nesh" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="introduction">Hyrje ne Informata Zyrtare bla bl bla<a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="purpose">Per cka sherben Informata Zyrtare <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>To help you find out inside information about what the UK government
+is doing.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="premise">How does the site work? <a href="#premise">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
+write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your request
+to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically published on the
+website for you and anyone else to find and read.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_me">Why would I bother to do this? <a href="#whybother_me">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
+things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national defence. Some
+it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about how government
+works, the better able we are to make suggestions to improve the things that
+are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are done well.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_them">Why would the public authority bother to reply? <a href="#whybother_them">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. The response
+will either contain the information you want, or give a valid legal reason why
+it must be kept confidential.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="who">Who makes WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#who">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by <a href="http://www.mysociety.org">mySociety</a>,
+and was initially <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/">funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust</a>. mySociety is a project of the
+registered charity <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>.
+If you like what we're doing, then you can
+<a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="updates">How can I keep up with news about WhatDoTheyKnow?<a href="#updates">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>We have a <a href="/blog">blog</a> and a <a href="http://www.twitter.com/whatdotheyknow">twitter feed</a>.
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/requesting">making requests</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..89a67d069
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/about.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+<% @title = "About" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="introduction">Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow <a href="#introduction">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="purpose">What is WhatDoTheyKnow for? <a href="#purpose">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>To help you find out inside information about what the UK government
+is doing.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="premise">How does the site work? <a href="#premise">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
+write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your request
+to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically published on the
+website for you and anyone else to find and read.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_me">Why would I bother to do this? <a href="#whybother_me">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
+things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national defence. Some
+it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about how government
+works, the better able we are to make suggestions to improve the things that
+are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are done well.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="whybother_them">Why would the public authority bother to reply? <a href="#whybother_them">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. The response
+will either contain the information you want, or give a valid legal reason why
+it must be kept confidential.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="who">Who makes WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#who">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by <a href="http://www.mysociety.org">mySociety</a>,
+and was initially <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/">funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust</a>. mySociety is a project of the
+registered charity <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy">UK Citizens Online Democracy</a>.
+If you like what we're doing, then you can
+<a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="updates">How can I keep up with news about WhatDoTheyKnow?<a href="#updates">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>We have a <a href="/blog">blog</a> and a <a href="http://www.twitter.com/whatdotheyknow">twitter feed</a>.
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/requesting">making requests</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/api.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/api.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6f27cf908
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/api.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+<% @title = "Application Programming Interface - API" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1><%=@title %></h1>
+
+<h2> Introduction </h2>
+
+<p>This page explains how programmers can make other websites and software
+interact with WhatDoTheyKnow via an "API".
+</p>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow does not have a full API yet, but we are gradually adding
+lots of things that are similar in use to an API as they are requested.
+</p>
+
+<hr>
+
+<h2> 1. Linking to new requests </h2>
+
+<p>To encourage your users to make links to a particular public authority, use URLs of the form
+<%= link_to new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") , new_request_to_body_url(:url_name => "liverpool_city_council") %>. 
+These are the parameters you can add to those URLs, either in the URL or from a form.
+
+<ul>
+    <li> <strong>title</strong> - default summary of the new request.</li>
+    <li> <strong>default_letter</strong> - default text of the body of the letter. The salutation (Dear...) and signoff (Yours...) are wrapped round this. </li>
+    <li> <strong>body</strong> - as an alternative to default_letter, this sets the default entire text of the request, so you can customise the salutation and signoff. </li>
+    <li> <strong>tags</strong> - space separated list of tags, so you can find and link up any requests made later, e.g. <em>openlylocal spending_id:12345</em>. The : indicates it is a machine tag. The values of machine tags may also include colons, useful for URIs.
+</ul>
+
+<hr>
+
+<h2> 2. RSS (actually, Atom) feeds </h2>
+
+<p>There are Atom feeds on most pages which list FOI requests, which you can
+use to get updates and links in XML format. Find the URL of the Atom feed in
+one of these ways: 
+<ul>
+    <li>Look for the <img src="/images/feed-16.png" alt=""> RSS feed links.</li>
+    <li>Examine the <tt>&lt;link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml"&gt;</tt> tag in the head of the HTML. </li>
+    <li>Add <tt>/feed</tt> to the start of another URL.
+</ul>
+
+<p>In particular, even complicated search queries have Atom feeds.
+You can do all sorts of things with them, such as query by authority, by file
+type, by date range, or by status. See the <a href="/search">advanced search
+tips</a> for details.
+
+<hr>
+
+<h2> 3. JSON structured data </h2>
+
+<p>Quite a few pages have JSON versions, which let you download information about
+objects in a structured form. Find them by:
+<ul>
+    <li>Adding <tt>.json</tt> to the end of the URL. </li>
+    <li>Look for the <tt>&lt;link rel="alternate" type="application/json"&gt;</tt> tag in the head of the HTML. </li>
+</ul>
+</p>
+
+<p>Requests, users and authorities all have JSON versions containing basic
+information about them. Every Atom feed has a JSON equivalent, containing
+information about the list of events in the feed.
+</p>
+
+<hr>
+<h2> 4. Spreadsheet of all authorities </h2>
+
+<p>
+A spreadsheet file listing every body in WhatDoTheyKnow is available:
+<%= link_to "all-authorities.csv", all_public_bodies_csv_url() %>
+</p>
+
+<hr>
+
+<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if you need an API feature that isn't there yet. It's
+very much a work in progress, and we do add things when people ask us to.</p>
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9dd4d4106
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+<% @title = "Contact us" %>
+
+<%= foi_error_messages_for :contact %>
+
+<div id="contact_preamble">
+
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+        <h1>Contact an authority to get official information</h1>
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="/new">Go here</a> to make a request, in public, for information
+            from UK public authorities.</li>
+
+            <li>
+            Asking for private information about yourself?
+            Please read our help page about
+            <a href="/help/requesting#data_protection">data protection</a>.
+            </li>
+        </ul>
+
+        <h1>Take up an issue with Government</h1>
+
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="http://www.writetothem.com">Write to your MP,
+            local councillor or other representative</a>.
+            <li><a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/">Number 10</a> is a good place to start if you would like to take an issue up with central government. </li>
+        </ul>
+
+
+    <% end %>
+
+    <h1>Contact the WhatDoTheyKnow team</h1>
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+            <ul>
+            <li>
+            Please read the  <a href="/help/about">help page</a> first, as it may
+            answer your question quicker. 
+            </li>
+            
+            <li>We'd love to hear how you've found using this site.
+               Either fill in this form, or send an email to <a
+               href="mailto:<%=@contact_email%>"><%=@contact_email%></a>
+            </li>
+
+            <li>We are a <strong>charity</strong> and not part of the
+            Government.</li>
+            </ul>
+    <% end %>
+</div>
+
+<% form_for :contact do |f| %>
+
+    <% if not @user %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_name">Your name:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :name, :size => 20 %>
+            (or <%= link_to "sign in", signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
+        </p>
+
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_email">Your email:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :email, :size => 20 %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_subject">Subject:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_field :subject, :size => 50 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Message to website:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_area :message, :rows => 10, :cols => 60 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <% if !@last_request.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to request:</label> 
+            <%=request_link(@last_request) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+    <% if !@last_body.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to authority:</label> 
+            <%=public_body_link(@last_body) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p class="form_note">
+    We can only help you with <strong>technical problems</strong>, or questions
+    about Freedom of Information. See the top of this page if you would like to
+    contact the Government.
+    </P>
+
+
+    <div class="form_button">
+        <%= hidden_field_tag(:submitted_contact_form, 1) %>
+        <%= submit_tag "Send message to the charity" %>
+        &lt;-- we run this site, not the Government!
+    </div>
+
+<% end %>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9dd4d4106
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+<% @title = "Contact us" %>
+
+<%= foi_error_messages_for :contact %>
+
+<div id="contact_preamble">
+
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+        <h1>Contact an authority to get official information</h1>
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="/new">Go here</a> to make a request, in public, for information
+            from UK public authorities.</li>
+
+            <li>
+            Asking for private information about yourself?
+            Please read our help page about
+            <a href="/help/requesting#data_protection">data protection</a>.
+            </li>
+        </ul>
+
+        <h1>Take up an issue with Government</h1>
+
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="http://www.writetothem.com">Write to your MP,
+            local councillor or other representative</a>.
+            <li><a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/">Number 10</a> is a good place to start if you would like to take an issue up with central government. </li>
+        </ul>
+
+
+    <% end %>
+
+    <h1>Contact the WhatDoTheyKnow team</h1>
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+            <ul>
+            <li>
+            Please read the  <a href="/help/about">help page</a> first, as it may
+            answer your question quicker. 
+            </li>
+            
+            <li>We'd love to hear how you've found using this site.
+               Either fill in this form, or send an email to <a
+               href="mailto:<%=@contact_email%>"><%=@contact_email%></a>
+            </li>
+
+            <li>We are a <strong>charity</strong> and not part of the
+            Government.</li>
+            </ul>
+    <% end %>
+</div>
+
+<% form_for :contact do |f| %>
+
+    <% if not @user %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_name">Your name:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :name, :size => 20 %>
+            (or <%= link_to "sign in", signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
+        </p>
+
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_email">Your email:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :email, :size => 20 %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_subject">Subject:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_field :subject, :size => 50 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Message to website:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_area :message, :rows => 10, :cols => 60 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <% if !@last_request.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to request:</label> 
+            <%=request_link(@last_request) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+    <% if !@last_body.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to authority:</label> 
+            <%=public_body_link(@last_body) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p class="form_note">
+    We can only help you with <strong>technical problems</strong>, or questions
+    about Freedom of Information. See the top of this page if you would like to
+    contact the Government.
+    </P>
+
+
+    <div class="form_button">
+        <%= hidden_field_tag(:submitted_contact_form, 1) %>
+        <%= submit_tag "Send message to the charity" %>
+        &lt;-- we run this site, not the Government!
+    </div>
+
+<% end %>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f50a46f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/contact.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+<% @title = "Contact us - sr" %>
+
+<%= foi_error_messages_for :contact %>
+
+<div id="contact_preamble">
+
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+        <h1>Contact an authority to get official information</h1>
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="/new">Go here</a> to make a request, in public, for information
+            from UK public authorities.</li>
+
+            <li>
+            Asking for private information about yourself?
+            Please read our help page about
+            <a href="/help/requesting#data_protection">data protection</a>.
+            </li>
+        </ul>
+
+        <h1>Take up an issue with Government</h1>
+
+        <ul>
+            <li><a href="http://www.writetothem.com">Write to your MP,
+            local councillor or other representative</a>.
+            <li><a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/">Number 10</a> is a good place to start if you would like to take an issue up with central government. </li>
+        </ul>
+
+
+    <% end %>
+
+    <h1>Contact the WhatDoTheyKnow team</h1>
+    <% if !flash[:notice] %>
+            <ul>
+            <li>
+            Please read the  <a href="/help/about">help page</a> first, as it may
+            answer your question quicker. 
+            </li>
+            
+            <li>We'd love to hear how you've found using this site.
+               Either fill in this form, or send an email to <a
+               href="mailto:<%=@contact_email%>"><%=@contact_email%></a>
+            </li>
+
+            <li>We are a <strong>charity</strong> and not part of the
+            Government.</li>
+            </ul>
+    <% end %>
+</div>
+
+<% form_for :contact do |f| %>
+
+    <% if not @user %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_name">Your name:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :name, :size => 20 %>
+            (or <%= link_to "sign in", signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
+        </p>
+
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_email">Your email:</label>
+            <%= f.text_field :email, :size => 20 %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_subject">Subject:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_field :subject, :size => 50 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <p>
+        <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Message to website:</label> 
+        <%= f.text_area :message, :rows => 10, :cols => 60 %>
+    </p>
+
+    <% if !@last_request.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to request:</label> 
+            <%=request_link(@last_request) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+    <% if !@last_body.nil? %>
+        <p>
+            <label class="form_label" for="contact_message">Include link to authority:</label> 
+            <%=public_body_link(@last_body) %>
+            <%= submit_tag "remove", :name => 'remove' %>
+        </p>
+    <% end %>
+
+    <p class="form_note">
+    We can only help you with <strong>technical problems</strong>, or questions
+    about Freedom of Information. See the top of this page if you would like to
+    contact the Government.
+    </P>
+
+
+    <div class="form_button">
+        <%= hidden_field_tag(:submitted_contact_form, 1) %>
+        <%= submit_tag "Send message to the charity" %>
+        &lt;-- we run this site, not the Government!
+    </div>
+
+<% end %>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ce7b5f123
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+<% @title = "Credit where credit is due" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="credits"><%= @title%> <a href="#credits">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="thanks">Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#thanks">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Oh, nearly everyone (and <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus">maybe you too</a>)! 
+<ul>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.yrtk.org">Heather Brooke</a> 
+    (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews">vampy!</a>) has
+    been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive for years now.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Both Phil Rodgers and <a href="http://www.flourish.org/blog/">Francis Irving</a>
+    entered it in a mySociety competition for ideas for public interest websites to build.
+</li>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/">It won</a>, 
+    and then Chris Lightfoot (<a href="http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html">RIP :(</a>) 
+    thought up the wheeze of intercepting email responses to requests and
+    automatically publishing them.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from
+    <a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/">a dead chocolate mogul</a> (<em>thank you!</em>) ...
+</li>
+<li>
+    ... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise Crow, Matthew Somerville
+    and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of design and coding to build
+    what you see today. 
+</li>
+<li> 
+    Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (<a href="http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/">great blog!</a>), 
+    Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard for using the site early on and giving
+    feedback (and/or legal advice!), and also to all our other users and
+    testers.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    The amazing team of volunteers who run the site, answer your support
+    emails, maintain the database of public authorities and 
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/10/13/behind-whatdotheyknow/">so much more</a>.
+    Thanks to John Cross, Ben Harris, Adam McGreggor, Alex Skene,
+    Richard Taylor.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Volunteers who have provided patches to the code - thanks Peter Collingbourne
+    and Tony Bowden. 
+</li>
+<li>
+    Everyone who has helped look up FOI email addresses.
+</li>
+<li>
+    We couldn't do any of this without those
+    <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees">crazy people</a> who volunteer,
+    amongst many other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Finally, all the officers and servants who have answered the many requests
+    made through the site. Their diligence, patience and professionalism is
+    what has actually made the information that you see here. Thank them for
+    helping make Government more transparent.
+</li>
+</ul>
+You're all stars.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="helpus">Can I help out? <a href="#helpus">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+    <p>Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers.</p>
+    <ul>
+    <li>You can <a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>. We're a registered charity.</li>
+    <li>Help people find successful requests, and monitor performance of authorities, by 
+    <a href="/categorise/play">playing the categorisation game</a>. </li>
+    <li>Find out FOI email addresses of <a href="/help/requesting#missing_body">authorities that we're missing</a>.</li>
+    <li>Write a blog post about either WhatDoTheyKnow or an interesting request that you've
+    found. Post about it on a forum that you frequent. Tell friends about it.</li> <li>If you're
+    a programmer, get the source code for our parent project, <a href="http://alaveteli.org">Alaveteli</a>
+    and tell us about patches we can pull. It's made in Ruby on Rails.
+    <li>Read more about <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus/">volunteering with mySociety</a>.
+    </ul>
+</dd>
+
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ce7b5f123
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+<% @title = "Credit where credit is due" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="credits"><%= @title%> <a href="#credits">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="thanks">Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#thanks">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Oh, nearly everyone (and <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus">maybe you too</a>)! 
+<ul>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.yrtk.org">Heather Brooke</a> 
+    (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews">vampy!</a>) has
+    been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive for years now.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Both Phil Rodgers and <a href="http://www.flourish.org/blog/">Francis Irving</a>
+    entered it in a mySociety competition for ideas for public interest websites to build.
+</li>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/">It won</a>, 
+    and then Chris Lightfoot (<a href="http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html">RIP :(</a>) 
+    thought up the wheeze of intercepting email responses to requests and
+    automatically publishing them.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from
+    <a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/">a dead chocolate mogul</a> (<em>thank you!</em>) ...
+</li>
+<li>
+    ... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise Crow, Matthew Somerville
+    and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of design and coding to build
+    what you see today. 
+</li>
+<li> 
+    Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (<a href="http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/">great blog!</a>), 
+    Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard for using the site early on and giving
+    feedback (and/or legal advice!), and also to all our other users and
+    testers.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    The amazing team of volunteers who run the site, answer your support
+    emails, maintain the database of public authorities and 
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/10/13/behind-whatdotheyknow/">so much more</a>.
+    Thanks to John Cross, Ben Harris, Adam McGreggor, Alex Skene,
+    Richard Taylor.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Volunteers who have provided patches to the code - thanks Peter Collingbourne
+    and Tony Bowden. 
+</li>
+<li>
+    Everyone who has helped look up FOI email addresses.
+</li>
+<li>
+    We couldn't do any of this without those
+    <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees">crazy people</a> who volunteer,
+    amongst many other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Finally, all the officers and servants who have answered the many requests
+    made through the site. Their diligence, patience and professionalism is
+    what has actually made the information that you see here. Thank them for
+    helping make Government more transparent.
+</li>
+</ul>
+You're all stars.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="helpus">Can I help out? <a href="#helpus">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+    <p>Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers.</p>
+    <ul>
+    <li>You can <a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>. We're a registered charity.</li>
+    <li>Help people find successful requests, and monitor performance of authorities, by 
+    <a href="/categorise/play">playing the categorisation game</a>. </li>
+    <li>Find out FOI email addresses of <a href="/help/requesting#missing_body">authorities that we're missing</a>.</li>
+    <li>Write a blog post about either WhatDoTheyKnow or an interesting request that you've
+    found. Post about it on a forum that you frequent. Tell friends about it.</li> <li>If you're
+    a programmer, get the source code for our parent project, <a href="http://alaveteli.org">Alaveteli</a>
+    and tell us about patches we can pull. It's made in Ruby on Rails.
+    <li>Read more about <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus/">volunteering with mySociety</a>.
+    </ul>
+</dd>
+
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ce7b5f123
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/credits.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+<% @title = "Credit where credit is due" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="credits"><%= @title%> <a href="#credits">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="thanks">Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow? <a href="#thanks">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Oh, nearly everyone (and <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus">maybe you too</a>)! 
+<ul>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.yrtk.org">Heather Brooke</a> 
+    (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews">vampy!</a>) has
+    been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive for years now.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Both Phil Rodgers and <a href="http://www.flourish.org/blog/">Francis Irving</a>
+    entered it in a mySociety competition for ideas for public interest websites to build.
+</li>
+<li>
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/">It won</a>, 
+    and then Chris Lightfoot (<a href="http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html">RIP :(</a>) 
+    thought up the wheeze of intercepting email responses to requests and
+    automatically publishing them.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from
+    <a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/">a dead chocolate mogul</a> (<em>thank you!</em>) ...
+</li>
+<li>
+    ... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise Crow, Matthew Somerville
+    and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of design and coding to build
+    what you see today. 
+</li>
+<li> 
+    Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (<a href="http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/">great blog!</a>), 
+    Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard for using the site early on and giving
+    feedback (and/or legal advice!), and also to all our other users and
+    testers.  
+</li>
+<li>
+    The amazing team of volunteers who run the site, answer your support
+    emails, maintain the database of public authorities and 
+    <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/10/13/behind-whatdotheyknow/">so much more</a>.
+    Thanks to John Cross, Ben Harris, Adam McGreggor, Alex Skene,
+    Richard Taylor.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Volunteers who have provided patches to the code - thanks Peter Collingbourne
+    and Tony Bowden. 
+</li>
+<li>
+    Everyone who has helped look up FOI email addresses.
+</li>
+<li>
+    We couldn't do any of this without those
+    <a href="http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees">crazy people</a> who volunteer,
+    amongst many other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return.
+</li>
+<li>
+    Finally, all the officers and servants who have answered the many requests
+    made through the site. Their diligence, patience and professionalism is
+    what has actually made the information that you see here. Thank them for
+    helping make Government more transparent.
+</li>
+</ul>
+You're all stars.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="helpus">Can I help out? <a href="#helpus">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+    <p>Yes please! We're built out of our supporters and volunteers.</p>
+    <ul>
+    <li>You can <a href="https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/">make a donation</a>. We're a registered charity.</li>
+    <li>Help people find successful requests, and monitor performance of authorities, by 
+    <a href="/categorise/play">playing the categorisation game</a>. </li>
+    <li>Find out FOI email addresses of <a href="/help/requesting#missing_body">authorities that we're missing</a>.</li>
+    <li>Write a blog post about either WhatDoTheyKnow or an interesting request that you've
+    found. Post about it on a forum that you frequent. Tell friends about it.</li> <li>If you're
+    a programmer, get the source code for our parent project, <a href="http://alaveteli.org">Alaveteli</a>
+    and tell us about patches we can pull. It's made in Ruby on Rails.
+    <li>Read more about <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/helpus/">volunteering with mySociety</a>.
+    </ul>
+</dd>
+
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b20ca31a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+<% @title = "FOI officer questions" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="officers"><%= @title %> <a href="#officers">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
+of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
+
+<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
+simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
+The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
+the Internet.
+</p>
+<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
+You might also like to read the <a
+href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
+the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
+site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
+any requests made using the site.
+
+<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
+thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="responses">Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests? <a href="#responses">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
+public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We
+also hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any
+subject that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information
+responses contain public information, which anybody could easily request
+again from the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to
+publish it widely.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="realpeople">Are the people making requests real people? <a href="#realpeople">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
+computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before
+they can send a request, each user must register on the site with a
+unique email address that we then verify. You can search this site and
+find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="email_only">An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request! <a href="#email_only">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes it is. This
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
+in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
+behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
+<p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
+different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
+making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
+via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
+for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
+<p>If that isn't enough for you, the
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
+the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
+appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
+email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
+href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
+use.</p>
+<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
+"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
+sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist" 
+any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
+If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
+and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
+up what happened to the message.
+</p>
+<p>Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
+needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
+each request page.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days">How do you calculate the deadline shown on request pages?<a href="#days">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act says:</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>A public authority must comply with section 1(1) <strong>promptly</strong> and
+in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
+receipt.</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
+the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
+here is that the law says authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong>.</p>
+
+<p>If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
+process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
+sentence or two saying what is happening. </p>
+
+<p>FOI officers often have to do a lot of <strong>hard work</strong> to answer
+requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
+to have more of that complexity visible.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days2">But really, how do you calculate the deadline?<a href="#days2">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
+must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
+it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
+taking the extra time to do.
+</p>
+
+<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
+for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
+
+<ul>
+
+<li>If the day we deliver the request by email is a working day, we count that
+as "day zero", even if it was delivered late in the evening. Days end at
+midnight.  We then count the next working day as "day one", and so on up to
+<strong>20 working days</strong>.</li>
+
+<li>If the day the request email was delivered was a non-working day, we count
+the next working day as "day one". Delivery is delivery, even if it happened on
+the weekend. Some authorities <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_regarding_body_scans#incoming-1100">disagree with this</a>, our lawyer disagrees with them. </li>
+
+<li>Requesters are encouraged to mark when they have <strong>clarified</strong>
+their request so the clock resets, but sometimes they get this wrong. If you
+see a problem with a particular request, let us know and we'll fix it.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
+Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
+one case which is not normal, see the next question about
+<a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
+disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
+whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
+during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>. 
+Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
+<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_interest_test">How do you reflect time extensions for public interest tests?<a href="#public_interest_test">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
+extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>.  Information
+Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
+complex" cases
+(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>). 
+WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
+phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
+exceeded. 
+</p>
+
+<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
+Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong> 
+to answer.  WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
+with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
+</p>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
+interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
+remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
+of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
+href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
+to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
+of the UK Act through Parliament). 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="large_file">How can I send a large file, which won't go by email?<a href="#large_file">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
+browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
+the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
+is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="names">Why do you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails? <a href="#names">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
+to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
+circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
+responses to requests.  Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
+missed one. 
+For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
+<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
+  href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
+forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
+form in an annotation.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
+world can request the same document and get a copy of it. 
+
+If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
+copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
+to take it down.  However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
+requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
+</dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
+<br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b20ca31a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+<% @title = "FOI officer questions" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="officers"><%= @title %> <a href="#officers">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
+of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
+
+<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
+simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
+The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
+the Internet.
+</p>
+<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
+You might also like to read the <a
+href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
+the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
+site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
+any requests made using the site.
+
+<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
+thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="responses">Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests? <a href="#responses">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
+public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We
+also hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any
+subject that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information
+responses contain public information, which anybody could easily request
+again from the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to
+publish it widely.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="realpeople">Are the people making requests real people? <a href="#realpeople">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
+computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before
+they can send a request, each user must register on the site with a
+unique email address that we then verify. You can search this site and
+find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="email_only">An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request! <a href="#email_only">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes it is. This
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
+in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
+behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
+<p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
+different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
+making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
+via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
+for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
+<p>If that isn't enough for you, the
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
+the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
+appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
+email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
+href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
+use.</p>
+<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
+"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
+sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist" 
+any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
+If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
+and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
+up what happened to the message.
+</p>
+<p>Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
+needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
+each request page.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days">How do you calculate the deadline shown on request pages?<a href="#days">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act says:</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>A public authority must comply with section 1(1) <strong>promptly</strong> and
+in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
+receipt.</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
+the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
+here is that the law says authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong>.</p>
+
+<p>If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
+process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
+sentence or two saying what is happening. </p>
+
+<p>FOI officers often have to do a lot of <strong>hard work</strong> to answer
+requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
+to have more of that complexity visible.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days2">But really, how do you calculate the deadline?<a href="#days2">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
+must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
+it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
+taking the extra time to do.
+</p>
+
+<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
+for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
+
+<ul>
+
+<li>If the day we deliver the request by email is a working day, we count that
+as "day zero", even if it was delivered late in the evening. Days end at
+midnight.  We then count the next working day as "day one", and so on up to
+<strong>20 working days</strong>.</li>
+
+<li>If the day the request email was delivered was a non-working day, we count
+the next working day as "day one". Delivery is delivery, even if it happened on
+the weekend. Some authorities <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_regarding_body_scans#incoming-1100">disagree with this</a>, our lawyer disagrees with them. </li>
+
+<li>Requesters are encouraged to mark when they have <strong>clarified</strong>
+their request so the clock resets, but sometimes they get this wrong. If you
+see a problem with a particular request, let us know and we'll fix it.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
+Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
+one case which is not normal, see the next question about
+<a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
+disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
+whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
+during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>. 
+Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
+<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_interest_test">How do you reflect time extensions for public interest tests?<a href="#public_interest_test">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
+extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>.  Information
+Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
+complex" cases
+(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>). 
+WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
+phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
+exceeded. 
+</p>
+
+<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
+Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong> 
+to answer.  WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
+with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
+</p>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
+interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
+remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
+of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
+href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
+to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
+of the UK Act through Parliament). 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="large_file">How can I send a large file, which won't go by email?<a href="#large_file">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
+browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
+the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
+is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="names">Why do you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails? <a href="#names">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
+to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
+circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
+responses to requests.  Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
+missed one. 
+For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
+<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
+  href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
+forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
+form in an annotation.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
+world can request the same document and get a copy of it. 
+
+If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
+copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
+to take it down.  However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
+requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
+</dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
+<br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b20ca31a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/officers.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+<% @title = "FOI officer questions" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="officers"><%= @title %> <a href="#officers">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="top">I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on? <a href="#top">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members
+of the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses.</p>
+
+<p>The FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
+simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
+The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
+the Internet.
+</p>
+<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
+You might also like to read the <a
+href="/help/about">introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow</a> to find out more about what
+the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
+site to find the authority that you work for, and view the status of
+any requests made using the site.
+
+<p>Finally, we welcome comments and
+thoughts from FOI officers, please <a href="/help/contact">get in touch</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="responses">Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests? <a href="#responses">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
+public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We
+also hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any
+subject that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information
+responses contain public information, which anybody could easily request
+again from the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to
+publish it widely.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="realpeople">Are the people making requests real people? <a href="#realpeople">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
+computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before
+they can send a request, each user must register on the site with a
+unique email address that we then verify. You can search this site and
+find a page listing all requests that each person has made.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="email_only">An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request! <a href="#email_only">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Yes it is. This
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives guidance on the matter, specifically
+in the context of requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="vexatious">Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests? <a href="#vexatious">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on
+behalf of our users, who are real people making the requests. </p>
+<p>Look at it like this - if lots of different people made requests from
+different Hotmail email addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were
+making vexatious requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made
+via WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
+for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests. </p>
+<p>If that isn't enough for you, the
+<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!<a href="#spam_problems">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>If a request appears on the site, then we have attempted to send it to
+the authority by email. Any delivery failure messages will automatically
+appear on the site. You can check the address we're using with the "View FOI
+email address" link which appears on the page for the authority. <a
+href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if there is a better address we can
+use.</p>
+<p>Requests are sometimes not delivered because they are quietly removed by
+"spam filters" in the IT department of the authority. Authorities can make
+sure this doesn't happen by asking their IT departments to "whitelist" 
+any email from <strong>@whatdotheyknow.com</strong>.
+If you <a href="/help/contact">ask us</a> we will resend any request,
+and/or give technical details of delivery so an IT department can chase
+up what happened to the message.
+</p>
+<p>Finally, you can respond to any request from your web browser, without
+needing any email, using the "respond to request" link at the bottom of
+each request page.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days">How do you calculate the deadline shown on request pages?<a href="#days">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act says:</p>
+
+<blockquote><p>A public authority must comply with section 1(1) <strong>promptly</strong> and
+in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of
+receipt.</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>The nerdy detail of exactly how weekends are counted, and what happens if
+the request arrives out of office hours, is just that - detail. What matters
+here is that the law says authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong>.</p>
+
+<p>If you've got a good reason why the request is going to take a while to
+process, requesters find it really helpful if you can send a quick email with a
+sentence or two saying what is happening. </p>
+
+<p>FOI officers often have to do a lot of <strong>hard work</strong> to answer
+requests, and this is hidden from the public. We think it would help everyone
+to have more of that complexity visible.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="days2">But really, how do you calculate the deadline?<a href="#days2">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Please read the answer to the previous question first. Legally, authorities
+must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to FOI requests. If they fail to do that,
+it is best if they show the hard work they are doing by explaining what is
+taking the extra time to do.
+</p>
+
+<p>That said, WhatDoTheyKnow does show the maximum legal deadline
+for response on each request. Here's how we calculate it.</p>
+
+<ul>
+
+<li>If the day we deliver the request by email is a working day, we count that
+as "day zero", even if it was delivered late in the evening. Days end at
+midnight.  We then count the next working day as "day one", and so on up to
+<strong>20 working days</strong>.</li>
+
+<li>If the day the request email was delivered was a non-working day, we count
+the next working day as "day one". Delivery is delivery, even if it happened on
+the weekend. Some authorities <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/policy_regarding_body_scans#incoming-1100">disagree with this</a>, our lawyer disagrees with them. </li>
+
+<li>Requesters are encouraged to mark when they have <strong>clarified</strong>
+their request so the clock resets, but sometimes they get this wrong. If you
+see a problem with a particular request, let us know and we'll fix it.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>The date thus calculated is shown on requests with the text "By law,
+Liverpool City Council should normally have responded by...". There is only
+one case which is not normal, see the next question about
+<a href="#public_interest_test">public interest test time extensions</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>Schools are also a special case, which WhatDoTheyKnow displays differently.
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Since June 2009, <strong>schools</strong> have "20 working days
+disregarding any working day which is not a school day, or 60 working days,
+whichever is first" (<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/draft/ukdsi_9780111477632_en_1">FOI (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2009</a>). WhatDoTheyKnow indicates on requests to schools that the 20 day deadline is only
+during term time, and shows them as definitely overdue after 60 working days
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>If you're getting really nerdy about all this, read the <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/timeforcompliance.pdf">detailed ICO guidance</a>. 
+Meanwhile, remember that the law says authorities must respond
+<strong>promptly</strong>. That's really what matters.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_interest_test">How do you reflect time extensions for public interest tests?<a href="#public_interest_test">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information Act lets authorities claim an indefinite time
+extension when applying a <strong>public interest test</strong>.  Information
+Commissioner guidance says that it should only be used in "exceptionally
+complex" cases
+(<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_4.pdf">FOI Good Practice Guidance No. 4</a>). 
+WhatDoTheyKnow doesn't specifically handle this case, which is why we use the
+phrase "should normally have responded by" when the 20 working day time is
+exceeded. 
+</p>
+
+<p>The same guidance says that, even in exceptionally complex cases, no
+Freedom of Information request should take more than <strong>40 working days</strong> 
+to answer.  WhatDoTheyKnow displays requests which are overdue by that much
+with stronger wording to indicate they are definitely late.
+</p>
+
+<p>The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act does not allow such a public
+interest extension. WhatDoTheyKnow would like to see the law changed to either
+remove the extension from the UK Act, or to reintroduce an absolute time limit
+of 40 working days even with the extension (the House of Lords <a
+href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2000-10-17&amp;number=1&amp;house=lords">voted
+to remove</a> provision for such a time limit during the initial passage
+of the UK Act through Parliament). 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="large_file">How can I send a large file, which won't go by email?<a href="#large_file">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Instead of email, you can respond to a request directly from your web
+browser, including uploading a file. To do this, choose "respond to request" at
+the bottom of the request's page. <a href="/help/contact">Contact us</a> if it
+is too big for even that (more than, say, 50Mb).
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="names">Why do you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails? <a href="#names">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We consider what officers or servants do in the course of their employment
+to be public information. We will only remove content in exceptional
+circumstances, see our <a href="/help/privacy#takedown">take down policy</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="mobiles">Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers? <a href="#mobiles">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>To prevent spam, we automatically remove most emails and some mobile numbers from
+responses to requests.  Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> if we've
+missed one. 
+For technical reasons we don't always remove them from attachments, such as certain PDFs.</p>
+<p>If you need to know what an address was that we've removed, please <a
+  href="/help/contact">get in touch with us</a>. Occasionally, an email address
+forms an important part of a response and we will post it up in an obscured
+form in an annotation.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="copyright"><a name="commercial"></a>What is your policy on copyright of documents?<a href="#copyright">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>Our Freedom of Information law is "applicant blind", so anyone in the
+world can request the same document and get a copy of it. 
+
+If you think our making a document available on the internet infringes your
+copyright, you may <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> and ask us
+to take it down.  However, to save tax payers' money by preventing duplicate
+requests, and for good public relations, we'd advise you not to do that.
+</dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>If you haven't already</strong>, read <a href="/help/about">the introduction</a> --&gt;
+<br><strong>Otherwise</strong>, the <a href="/help/credits">credits</a> or the <a href="/help/api">programmers API</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..001427181
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+<% @title = "Your privacy" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="privacy"><%= @title %> <a href="#privacy">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="email_address">Who gets to see my email address? <a href="#email_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
+or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
+request to.  They only get to see an email address 
+@whatdotheyknow.com which is specific to that request.  </p>
+<p>If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
+email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="nasty_spam">Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address? <a href="#nasty_spam">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
+relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
+or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
+sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law, or
+you ask us to.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_request">Why will my name and my request appear publicly on the site? <a href="#public_request">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
+make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
+requests (<a href="#delete_requests">more details</a>).
+</p>
+<p>
+Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
+It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
+writes the response to your request.  Using your real name also helps people
+get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you. 
+</p>
+<p>By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
+Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
+to publish your full name.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="real_name">Can I make an FOI request using a pseudonym? <a href="#real_name">#</a> </dt>
+
+
+<dd>
+<p>Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/name_of_applicant_fop083_v1.pdf">guidance from the Information Commissioner</a> (January 2009).
+</p>
+
+<p>However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
+authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
+You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
+used a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<p>Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
+pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
+Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
+</p>
+
+<p>There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Use a different form of your name. The guidance says
+that "Mr Arthur Thomas Roberts" can make a valid request as "Arthur Roberts",
+"A. T. Roberts", or "Mr Roberts", but <strong>not</strong> as "Arthur" or "A.T.R.". 
+</li>
+<li>Women may use their maiden name.</li>
+<li>In most cases, you may use any name by which you are "widely known and/or
+is regularly used".
+<li>Use the name of an organisation, the name of a company, the trading name of
+a company, or the trading name of a sole trader.
+<li>Ask someone else to make the request on your behalf. 
+<li>You may, if you are really stuck, ask us to make the request on
+your behalf. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with
+a good reason why you cannot make the request yourself and cannot
+ask a friend to. We don't have the resources to do this for everyone.
+</ul>
+
+<p>Please do not try to impersonate someone else.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="full_address">They've asked for my postal address! <a href="#full_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
+that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence", 
+and that the email address you are using is sufficient. 
+</p>
+<p>
+The Ministry of Justice has <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm">guidance
+on this</a> &ndash;
+<em>"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
+transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable 
+... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
+address should be treated as the return address."
+</em>
+</p>
+<p>As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's 
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_2008_final.pdf">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
+<em>"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."</em>
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
+they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
+to scan in the documents for you. You can even <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outgoing-532">offer to gift them a scanner</a>, which in that particular case
+embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already.</p>
+
+<p>If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
+in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
+give you an email address to use for that purpose.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="delete_requests">Can you delete my requests, or alter my name?  <a href="#delete_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
+Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
+a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
+reason, we will not delete requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
+on the website, <a href="#takedown">see the next question</a>.
+Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
+</p>
+
+<p>If you're worried about this before you make your request,
+see the section on <a href="#real_name">pseudonyms</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="takedown">Can you take down personal information about me? <a href="#takedown">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+
+<p>If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
+us to remove or hide, then please <a href="/help/contact">let us know</a>.
+Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
+where it appears on the site.</p>
+
+<p>If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
+posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
+requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
+concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
+pointing out anything they see.</p>
+
+<p>We consider that there is a strong public interest in
+retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
+remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
+a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
+safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
+such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
+line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
+which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
+been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website.</p>
+
+<p>For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
+whether information should be removed. 
+<a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3190650"> Section 32</a> 
+of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
+publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
+as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
+that authorities resend these with the personal information removed.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Learn more</strong> from the help for <a href="/help/officers">FOI officers</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..001427181
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+<% @title = "Your privacy" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="privacy"><%= @title %> <a href="#privacy">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="email_address">Who gets to see my email address? <a href="#email_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
+or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
+request to.  They only get to see an email address 
+@whatdotheyknow.com which is specific to that request.  </p>
+<p>If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
+email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="nasty_spam">Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address? <a href="#nasty_spam">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
+relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
+or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
+sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law, or
+you ask us to.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_request">Why will my name and my request appear publicly on the site? <a href="#public_request">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
+make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
+requests (<a href="#delete_requests">more details</a>).
+</p>
+<p>
+Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
+It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
+writes the response to your request.  Using your real name also helps people
+get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you. 
+</p>
+<p>By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
+Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
+to publish your full name.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="real_name">Can I make an FOI request using a pseudonym? <a href="#real_name">#</a> </dt>
+
+
+<dd>
+<p>Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/name_of_applicant_fop083_v1.pdf">guidance from the Information Commissioner</a> (January 2009).
+</p>
+
+<p>However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
+authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
+You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
+used a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<p>Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
+pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
+Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
+</p>
+
+<p>There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Use a different form of your name. The guidance says
+that "Mr Arthur Thomas Roberts" can make a valid request as "Arthur Roberts",
+"A. T. Roberts", or "Mr Roberts", but <strong>not</strong> as "Arthur" or "A.T.R.". 
+</li>
+<li>Women may use their maiden name.</li>
+<li>In most cases, you may use any name by which you are "widely known and/or
+is regularly used".
+<li>Use the name of an organisation, the name of a company, the trading name of
+a company, or the trading name of a sole trader.
+<li>Ask someone else to make the request on your behalf. 
+<li>You may, if you are really stuck, ask us to make the request on
+your behalf. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with
+a good reason why you cannot make the request yourself and cannot
+ask a friend to. We don't have the resources to do this for everyone.
+</ul>
+
+<p>Please do not try to impersonate someone else.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="full_address">They've asked for my postal address! <a href="#full_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
+that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence", 
+and that the email address you are using is sufficient. 
+</p>
+<p>
+The Ministry of Justice has <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm">guidance
+on this</a> &ndash;
+<em>"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
+transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable 
+... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
+address should be treated as the return address."
+</em>
+</p>
+<p>As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's 
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_2008_final.pdf">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
+<em>"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."</em>
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
+they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
+to scan in the documents for you. You can even <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outgoing-532">offer to gift them a scanner</a>, which in that particular case
+embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already.</p>
+
+<p>If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
+in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
+give you an email address to use for that purpose.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="delete_requests">Can you delete my requests, or alter my name?  <a href="#delete_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
+Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
+a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
+reason, we will not delete requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
+on the website, <a href="#takedown">see the next question</a>.
+Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
+</p>
+
+<p>If you're worried about this before you make your request,
+see the section on <a href="#real_name">pseudonyms</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="takedown">Can you take down personal information about me? <a href="#takedown">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+
+<p>If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
+us to remove or hide, then please <a href="/help/contact">let us know</a>.
+Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
+where it appears on the site.</p>
+
+<p>If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
+posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
+requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
+concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
+pointing out anything they see.</p>
+
+<p>We consider that there is a strong public interest in
+retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
+remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
+a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
+safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
+such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
+line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
+which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
+been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website.</p>
+
+<p>For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
+whether information should be removed. 
+<a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3190650"> Section 32</a> 
+of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
+publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
+as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
+that authorities resend these with the personal information removed.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Learn more</strong> from the help for <a href="/help/officers">FOI officers</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..001427181
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/privacy.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+<% @title = "Your privacy" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="privacy"><%= @title %> <a href="#privacy">#</a> </h1>
+
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="email_address">Who gets to see my email address? <a href="#email_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>We will not disclose your email address to anyone unless we are obliged to by law,
+or you ask us to. This includes the public authority that you are sending a
+request to.  They only get to see an email address 
+@whatdotheyknow.com which is specific to that request.  </p>
+<p>If you send a message to another user on the site, then it will reveal your
+email address to them. You will be told that this is going to happen.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="nasty_spam">Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address? <a href="#nasty_spam">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
+relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
+or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
+sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law, or
+you ask us to.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="public_request">Why will my name and my request appear publicly on the site? <a href="#public_request">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>We publish your request on the Internet so that anybody can read it and
+make use of the information that you have found. We do not normally delete
+requests (<a href="#delete_requests">more details</a>).
+</p>
+<p>
+Your name is tangled up with your request, so has to be published as well.
+It is only fair, as we're going to publish the name of the civil servant who
+writes the response to your request.  Using your real name also helps people
+get in touch with you to assist you with your research or to campaign with you. 
+</p>
+<p>By law, you must use your real name for the request to be a valid Freedom of
+Information request. See the next question for alternatives if you do not want
+to publish your full name.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="real_name">Can I make an FOI request using a pseudonym? <a href="#real_name">#</a> </dt>
+
+
+<dd>
+<p>Technically, you must use your real name for your request to be a valid Freedom of Information request in law. See this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/name_of_applicant_fop083_v1.pdf">guidance from the Information Commissioner</a> (January 2009).
+</p>
+
+<p>However, the same guidance also says it is good practice for the public
+authority to still consider a request made using an obvious pseudonym.
+You should refer to this if a public authority refuses a request because you
+used a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<p>Be careful though, even if the authority follows this good practice, the
+pseudonym will probably make it impossible for you to complain to the
+Information Commissioner later about the handling of your request.
+</p>
+
+<p>There are several good alternatives to using a pseudonym.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Use a different form of your name. The guidance says
+that "Mr Arthur Thomas Roberts" can make a valid request as "Arthur Roberts",
+"A. T. Roberts", or "Mr Roberts", but <strong>not</strong> as "Arthur" or "A.T.R.". 
+</li>
+<li>Women may use their maiden name.</li>
+<li>In most cases, you may use any name by which you are "widely known and/or
+is regularly used".
+<li>Use the name of an organisation, the name of a company, the trading name of
+a company, or the trading name of a sole trader.
+<li>Ask someone else to make the request on your behalf. 
+<li>You may, if you are really stuck, ask us to make the request on
+your behalf. Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with
+a good reason why you cannot make the request yourself and cannot
+ask a friend to. We don't have the resources to do this for everyone.
+</ul>
+
+<p>Please do not try to impersonate someone else.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="full_address">They've asked for my postal address! <a href="#full_address">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to them saying
+that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence", 
+and that the email address you are using is sufficient. 
+</p>
+<p>
+The Ministry of Justice has <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm">guidance
+on this</a> &ndash;
+<em>"As well as hard copy written correspondence, requests that are
+transmitted electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable 
+... If a request is received by email and no postal address is given, the email
+address should be treated as the return address."
+</em>
+</p>
+<p>As if that isn't enough, the Information Commissioner's 
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_2008_final.pdf">Hints for Practitioners</a> say
+<em>"Any correspondence could include a request for information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within the scope of the legislation."</em>
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="postal_answer">No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response! <a href="#postal_answer">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want,
+they may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them
+to scan in the documents for you. You can even <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outgoing-532">offer to gift them a scanner</a>, which in that particular case
+embarrassed the authority into finding one they had already.</p>
+
+<p>If that doesn't work, and you want to provide your postal address privately
+in order to receive the documents, mark your request as "They are going to reply by post", and it will
+give you an email address to use for that purpose.</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="delete_requests">Can you delete my requests, or alter my name?  <a href="#delete_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow is a permanent, public archive of Freedom of
+Information requests. Even though you may not find the response to
+a request useful any more, it may be of interest to others. For this
+reason, we will not delete requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Under exceptional circumstances we may remove or change your name
+on the website, <a href="#takedown">see the next question</a>.
+Similarly, we may also remove other personal information.
+</p>
+
+<p>If you're worried about this before you make your request,
+see the section on <a href="#real_name">pseudonyms</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="takedown">Can you take down personal information about me? <a href="#takedown">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+
+<p>If you see any personal information about you on the site which you'd like
+us to remove or hide, then please <a href="/help/contact">let us know</a>.
+Specify exactly what information you believe to be problematic and why, and
+where it appears on the site.</p>
+
+<p>If it is sensitive personal information that has been accidentally
+posted, then we will usually remove it. Normally we will only consider
+requests to remove personal information which come from the individual
+concerned, but for sensitive information we would appreciate anyone
+pointing out anything they see.</p>
+
+<p>We consider that there is a strong public interest in
+retaining the names of officers or servants of public authorities. We will only
+remove such names in exceptional circumstances, such as where the disclosure of
+a name and position of employment would substantially risk an individual's
+safety. If you are such an official and you wish to have your name removed for
+such an urgent reason, you must supply us with a request to do so from your
+line manager. This request must demonstrate that a risk has been perceived
+which outweighs the public interest, and must demonstrate that efforts have
+been made to conceal the name on the organisation's own website.</p>
+
+<p>For all other requests we apply a public interest test to decide
+whether information should be removed. 
+<a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3190650"> Section 32</a> 
+of the Data Protection Act 1998 permits us to do this, as the material we
+publish is journalistic. We cannot easily edit many types of attachments (such
+as PDFs, or Microsoft Word or Excel files), so we will usually ask
+that authorities resend these with the personal information removed.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Learn more</strong> from the help for <a href="/help/officers">FOI officers</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..203de623b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+<% @title = "Making requests engish yes" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="making_requests"><%= @title %> <a href="#making_requests">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="which_authority">I'm not sure which authority to make my request to, how can I find out? <a href="#which_authority">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
+who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
+<ul>
+<li>Browse or search WhatDoTheyKnow looking for similar requests to yours.</li>
+<li>When you've found an authority you think might have the information, use
+the "home page" link on the right hand side of their page to check what they do
+on their website.</li>
+<li>Contact the authority by phone or email to ask if they hold the kind of
+information you're after.</li>
+<li>Don't worry excessively about getting the right authority. If you get it
+wrong, they ought to advise you who to make the request to instead.
+</li>
+<li>If you've got a thorny case, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> for help.</li>
+</ul>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="missing_body">You're missing the public authority that I want to request from! <a href="#missing_body">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with the name of the public authority and,
+if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
+</p>
+<p>If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
+to hear from you too.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="authorities">Why do you include some authorities that aren't formally subject to FOI?<a href="#authorities">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow lets you make requests for information to a range of
+organisations:</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the Environmental Regulations (a less well  
+  defined group)</li>
+  <li> Those which voluntarily comply with the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those which aren't subject to the Act but we think should be, on grounds
+  such as them having significant public responsibilities. 
+  </li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
+scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
+to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="focused">Why must I keep my request focused?<a href="#focused">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>
+Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
+easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
+<i>not</i> include any of the following:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>arguments about your cause</li>
+<li>statements that could defame or insult others</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
+libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
+make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
+requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
+Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
+run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
+need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
+and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
+"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
+from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
+annotations after submitting the request).
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="fees">Does it cost me anything to make a request?<a href="#fees">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Making an FOI request is nearly always free.</p>
+
+<p>Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
+acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
+They hardly ever will actually charge a fee.  If they do, they can only charge you if
+you have specifically agreed in advance to pay.  <a
+    href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/chargingafee.pdf">More
+    details</a> from the Information Commissioner.
+</p>
+
+<p>Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
+of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
+public authorities). At this point you can refine your
+request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
+spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="quickly_response">How quickly will I get a response? <a href="#quickly_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to
+requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
+20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
+or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
+(<a href="/help/officers#days">full details</a>).
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow will email you if you don't get a timely response.  You can
+then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
+are breaking the law.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="deadline_extended">Deadline extended <a href="#deadline_extended">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must needs <strong>more time</strong> for request ... (TO DO)
+</p>
+
+
+</dd>
+<dt id="no_response">What if I never get a response?<a href="#no_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>There are several things you can do if you never get a response.</p>
+<ul>
+    <li>Sometimes there has been a genuine problem and the authority never
+    received the request. It is worth telephoning the authority and politely
+    checking that they received the request. It was sent to them by email.
+    </li>
+    <li>If they have not received it, the problem is most likely due to
+    "spam filters". Refer the authority to the measures in the answer 
+    '<a href="/help/officers#spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!</a>' 
+    in the FOI officers section of this help. 
+    </li>
+    <li>If you're still having no luck, then you can ask for an internal review,
+    and then complain to the Information Commissioner about the authority.
+    Read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</ul>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="not_satifised">What if I'm not satisfied with the response? <a href="#not_satifised">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in time,
+then read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="reuse">It says I can't re-use the information I got!<a href="#reuse">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+<p>Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the 
+"<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051515">Re-Use of Public Sector
+Information Regulations 2005</a>", which at first glance implies you may not
+be able do anything with the information.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
+quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
+information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
+allowed to do so.  See <a href="/help/officers#copyright">our policy on copyright</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="ico_help">Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making requests? <a href="#ico_help">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Have a look at the
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx">access to official information</a>
+pages on the Information Commissioner's website.</p>
+
+<p>If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
+the process is very similar. There are differences around time
+limits for compliance.
+See the <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1858&amp;sID=321">Scottish
+Information Commissioner's guidance</a> for details.</p> 
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="data_protection">Can I request information about myself? <a href="#data_protection">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>No. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made under the Freedom of
+Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
+individual.</p>
+
+<p>If you would like to know what information a public
+authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
+private using Data Protection law.  The leaflet "<a
+href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information</a>" (on the Information Commissioner's
+website) explains how to do this.</p>
+
+<p>If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
+unwittingly, in a request, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>
+immediately so we can remove it.</p>
+</dd>
+
+
+<dt id="private_requests">I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story) <a href="#private_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All
+responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
+to read.  </p>
+<p>You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
+make a request in private.  If you're interested in buying a system which helps
+you manage FOI requests in secret, then <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="eir">Why can I only request information about the environment from some authorities? <a href="#eir">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Some public authorities, such as <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water">South East Water</a>,
+don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
+the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR). 
+</p>
+
+<p>It's a very similar law, so you make a request
+to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
+difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
+that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
+means. It is quite broad.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, request environmental information from other
+authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
+authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
+(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under. 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="multiple">Can I make the same to request to lots of authorities, e.g. all councils? <a href="#multiple">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We ask you to first send a test version of your request to a few
+authorities. Their responses will help you improve the wording of your request,
+so that you get the best information when you send the request to all of
+the authorities. There is currently no automated system for sending the request
+to the other authorities, you must copy and paste it by hand.
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="offsite">I made a request off the site, how do I upload it to the archive?<a href="#offsite">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is an archive of requests made through the site,
+and does not try to be an archive of all FOI requests. We'll never support uploading
+other requests. For one thing, we wouldn't be able to verify that other
+responses actually came from the authority. If this really matters to you,
+you can always make the same request again via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="moderation">How do you moderate request annotations? <a href="#moderation">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+<p>Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help
+people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
+can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
+</p>
+<p>Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
+Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.</p>
+<dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/privacy">your privacy</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..aa41121ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+<% @title = "Bej kerkes" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="making_requests"><%= @title %> <a href="#making_requests">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="which_authority">I'm not sure which authority to make my request to, how can I find out? <a href="#which_authority">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
+who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
+<ul>
+<li>Browse or search WhatDoTheyKnow looking for similar requests to yours.</li>
+<li>When you've found an authority you think might have the information, use
+the "home page" link on the right hand side of their page to check what they do
+on their website.</li>
+<li>Contact the authority by phone or email to ask if they hold the kind of
+information you're after.</li>
+<li>Don't worry excessively about getting the right authority. If you get it
+wrong, they ought to advise you who to make the request to instead.
+</li>
+<li>If you've got a thorny case, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> for help.</li>
+</ul>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="missing_body">You're missing the public authority that I want to request from! <a href="#missing_body">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with the name of the public authority and,
+if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
+</p>
+<p>If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
+to hear from you too.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="authorities">Why do you include some authorities that aren't formally subject to FOI?<a href="#authorities">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow lets you make requests for information to a range of
+organisations:</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the Environmental Regulations (a less well  
+  defined group)</li>
+  <li> Those which voluntarily comply with the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those which aren't subject to the Act but we think should be, on grounds
+  such as them having significant public responsibilities. 
+  </li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
+scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
+to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="focused">Why must I keep my request focused?<a href="#focused">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>
+Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
+easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
+<i>not</i> include any of the following:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>arguments about your cause</li>
+<li>statements that could defame or insult others</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
+libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
+make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
+requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
+Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
+run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
+need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
+and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
+"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
+from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
+annotations after submitting the request).
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="fees">Does it cost me anything to make a request?<a href="#fees">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Making an FOI request is nearly always free.</p>
+
+<p>Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
+acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
+They hardly ever will actually charge a fee.  If they do, they can only charge you if
+you have specifically agreed in advance to pay.  <a
+    href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/chargingafee.pdf">More
+    details</a> from the Information Commissioner.
+</p>
+
+<p>Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
+of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
+public authorities). At this point you can refine your
+request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
+spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="quickly_response">How quickly will I get a response? <a href="#quickly_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to
+requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
+20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
+or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
+(<a href="/help/officers#days">full details</a>).
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow will email you if you don't get a timely response.  You can
+then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
+are breaking the law.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="deadline_extended">Deadline extended <a href="#deadline_extended">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must needs <strong>more time</strong> for request ... (TO DO)
+</p>
+
+
+</dd>
+<dt id="no_response">What if I never get a response?<a href="#no_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>There are several things you can do if you never get a response.</p>
+<ul>
+    <li>Sometimes there has been a genuine problem and the authority never
+    received the request. It is worth telephoning the authority and politely
+    checking that they received the request. It was sent to them by email.
+    </li>
+    <li>If they have not received it, the problem is most likely due to
+    "spam filters". Refer the authority to the measures in the answer 
+    '<a href="/help/officers#spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!</a>' 
+    in the FOI officers section of this help. 
+    </li>
+    <li>If you're still having no luck, then you can ask for an internal review,
+    and then complain to the Information Commissioner about the authority.
+    Read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</ul>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="not_satifised">What if I'm not satisfied with the response? <a href="#not_satifised">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in time,
+then read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="reuse">It says I can't re-use the information I got!<a href="#reuse">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+<p>Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the 
+"<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051515">Re-Use of Public Sector
+Information Regulations 2005</a>", which at first glance implies you may not
+be able do anything with the information.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
+quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
+information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
+allowed to do so.  See <a href="/help/officers#copyright">our policy on copyright</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="ico_help">Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making requests? <a href="#ico_help">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Have a look at the
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx">access to official information</a>
+pages on the Information Commissioner's website.</p>
+
+<p>If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
+the process is very similar. There are differences around time
+limits for compliance.
+See the <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1858&amp;sID=321">Scottish
+Information Commissioner's guidance</a> for details.</p> 
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="data_protection">Can I request information about myself? <a href="#data_protection">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>No. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made under the Freedom of
+Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
+individual.</p>
+
+<p>If you would like to know what information a public
+authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
+private using Data Protection law.  The leaflet "<a
+href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information</a>" (on the Information Commissioner's
+website) explains how to do this.</p>
+
+<p>If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
+unwittingly, in a request, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>
+immediately so we can remove it.</p>
+</dd>
+
+
+<dt id="private_requests">I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story) <a href="#private_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All
+responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
+to read.  </p>
+<p>You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
+make a request in private.  If you're interested in buying a system which helps
+you manage FOI requests in secret, then <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="eir">Why can I only request information about the environment from some authorities? <a href="#eir">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Some public authorities, such as <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water">South East Water</a>,
+don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
+the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR). 
+</p>
+
+<p>It's a very similar law, so you make a request
+to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
+difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
+that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
+means. It is quite broad.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, request environmental information from other
+authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
+authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
+(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under. 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="multiple">Can I make the same to request to lots of authorities, e.g. all councils? <a href="#multiple">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We ask you to first send a test version of your request to a few
+authorities. Their responses will help you improve the wording of your request,
+so that you get the best information when you send the request to all of
+the authorities. There is currently no automated system for sending the request
+to the other authorities, you must copy and paste it by hand.
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="offsite">I made a request off the site, how do I upload it to the archive?<a href="#offsite">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is an archive of requests made through the site,
+and does not try to be an archive of all FOI requests. We'll never support uploading
+other requests. For one thing, we wouldn't be able to verify that other
+responses actually came from the authority. If this really matters to you,
+you can always make the same request again via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="moderation">How do you moderate request annotations? <a href="#moderation">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+<p>Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help
+people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
+can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
+</p>
+<p>Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
+Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.</p>
+<dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/privacy">your privacy</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..aa41121ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/requesting.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+<% @title = "Bej kerkes" %>
+
+<%= render :partial => 'sidebar' %>
+
+<h1 id="making_requests"><%= @title %> <a href="#making_requests">#</a> </h1>
+<dl>
+
+<dt id="which_authority">I'm not sure which authority to make my request to, how can I find out? <a href="#which_authority">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>It can be hard to untangle government's complicated structured, and work out
+who knows the information that you want. Here are a few tips:
+<ul>
+<li>Browse or search WhatDoTheyKnow looking for similar requests to yours.</li>
+<li>When you've found an authority you think might have the information, use
+the "home page" link on the right hand side of their page to check what they do
+on their website.</li>
+<li>Contact the authority by phone or email to ask if they hold the kind of
+information you're after.</li>
+<li>Don't worry excessively about getting the right authority. If you get it
+wrong, they ought to advise you who to make the request to instead.
+</li>
+<li>If you've got a thorny case, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> for help.</li>
+</ul>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="missing_body">You're missing the public authority that I want to request from! <a href="#missing_body">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a> with the name of the public authority and,
+if you can find it, their contact email address for Freedom of Information requests.
+</p>
+<p>If you'd like to help add a whole category of public authority to the site, we'd love
+to hear from you too.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="authorities">Why do you include some authorities that aren't formally subject to FOI?<a href="#authorities">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow lets you make requests for information to a range of
+organisations:</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those formally subject to the Environmental Regulations (a less well  
+  defined group)</li>
+  <li> Those which voluntarily comply with the FOI Act</li>
+  <li> Those which aren't subject to the Act but we think should be, on grounds
+  such as them having significant public responsibilities. 
+  </li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>In the last case, we're using the site to lobby for expansion of the
+scope of the FOI Act. Even if an organisation is not legally obliged to respond
+to an FOI request, they can still do so voluntarily.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="focused">Why must I keep my request focused?<a href="#focused">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>
+Please put in your request only what is needed so that someone can
+easily identify what information you are asking for. Please do
+<i>not</i> include any of the following:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>arguments about your cause</li>
+<li>statements that could defame or insult others</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+If you do, we may have to remove your request to avoid problems with
+libel law, which is a pain for both you and us. Short, succinct messages
+make it easier for authorities to be clear what information you are
+requesting, which means you will get a reply more quickly.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If you want information to support an argument or campaign, Freedom of
+Information is a powerful tool. Although you may not use this site to
+run your campaign, we encourage you to use it to get the information you
+need. We also encourage to run your campaign elsewhere - one effective
+and very easy way is to <%= link_to 'start your own blog',
+"http://wordpress.com/"%>. You are welcome to link to your campaign
+from this site in an annotation to your request (you can make
+annotations after submitting the request).
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="fees">Does it cost me anything to make a request?<a href="#fees">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+
+<p>Making an FOI request is nearly always free.</p>
+
+<p>Authorities often include unnecessary, scary, boilerplate in
+acknowledgement messages saying they "may" charge a fee. Ignore such notices.
+They hardly ever will actually charge a fee.  If they do, they can only charge you if
+you have specifically agreed in advance to pay.  <a
+    href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/practical_application/chargingafee.pdf">More
+    details</a> from the Information Commissioner.
+</p>
+
+<p>Sometimes an authority will refuse your request, saying that the cost
+of handling it exceeds £600 (for central government) or £450 (for all other
+public authorities). At this point you can refine your
+request. e.g. it would be much cheaper for an authority to tell you the amount
+spent on marshmallows in the past year than in the past ten years.
+</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+
+
+<dt id="quickly_response">How quickly will I get a response? <a href="#quickly_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must respond <strong>promptly</strong> to
+requests.
+</p>
+
+<p>Even if they are not prompt, in nearly all cases they must respond within
+20 working days. If you had to clarify your request, or they are a school,
+or one or two other cases, then they may have more time
+(<a href="/help/officers#days">full details</a>).
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow will email you if you don't get a timely response.  You can
+then send the public authority a message to remind them, and tell them if they
+are breaking the law.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="deadline_extended">Deadline extended <a href="#deadline_extended">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>By law, public authorities must needs <strong>more time</strong> for request ... (TO DO)
+</p>
+
+
+</dd>
+<dt id="no_response">What if I never get a response?<a href="#no_response">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>There are several things you can do if you never get a response.</p>
+<ul>
+    <li>Sometimes there has been a genuine problem and the authority never
+    received the request. It is worth telephoning the authority and politely
+    checking that they received the request. It was sent to them by email.
+    </li>
+    <li>If they have not received it, the problem is most likely due to
+    "spam filters". Refer the authority to the measures in the answer 
+    '<a href="/help/officers#spam_problems">I can see a request on WhatDoTheyKnow, but we never got it by email!</a>' 
+    in the FOI officers section of this help. 
+    </li>
+    <li>If you're still having no luck, then you can ask for an internal review,
+    and then complain to the Information Commissioner about the authority.
+    Read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</ul>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="not_satifised">What if I'm not satisfied with the response? <a href="#not_satifised">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in time,
+then read our page '<a href="/help/unhappy">Unhappy about the response you got?</a>'.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="reuse">It says I can't re-use the information I got!<a href="#reuse">#</a> </dt>
+<dd>
+<p>Authorities often add legal boilerplate about the 
+"<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051515">Re-Use of Public Sector
+Information Regulations 2005</a>", which at first glance implies you may not
+be able do anything with the information.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, write articles about the information or summarise it, or
+quote parts of it. We also think you should feel free to republish the
+information in full, just as we do, even though in theory you might not be
+allowed to do so.  See <a href="/help/officers#copyright">our policy on copyright</a>.</p>
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="ico_help">Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making requests? <a href="#ico_help">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Have a look at the
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx">access to official information</a>
+pages on the Information Commissioner's website.</p>
+
+<p>If you're requesting information from a Scottish public authority,
+the process is very similar. There are differences around time
+limits for compliance.
+See the <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1858&amp;sID=321">Scottish
+Information Commissioner's guidance</a> for details.</p> 
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="data_protection">Can I request information about myself? <a href="#data_protection">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>No. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made under the Freedom of
+Information Act, and cannot help you find information about a private
+individual.</p>
+
+<p>If you would like to know what information a public
+authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access Request" in
+private using Data Protection law.  The leaflet "<a
+href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/introductory/subject_access_rights.pdf">How to access your information</a>" (on the Information Commissioner's
+website) explains how to do this.</p>
+
+<p>If you see that somebody has included personal information, perhaps
+unwittingly, in a request, please <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>
+immediately so we can remove it.</p>
+</dd>
+
+
+<dt id="private_requests">I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story) <a href="#private_requests">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd><p>WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All
+responses that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone
+to read.  </p>
+<p>You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
+make a request in private.  If you're interested in buying a system which helps
+you manage FOI requests in secret, then <a href="/help/contact">contact us</a>.
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="eir">Why can I only request information about the environment from some authorities? <a href="#eir">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>
+<p>Some public authorities, such as <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water">South East Water</a>,
+don't come under the Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called
+the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR). 
+</p>
+
+<p>It's a very similar law, so you make a request
+to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI request. The only
+difference is that on the page where your write you request, it reminds you
+that you can only request "environmental information" and tells you what that
+means. It is quite broad.
+</p>
+
+<p>You can, of course, request environmental information from other
+authorities. Just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
+authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information Regulations
+(EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under. 
+</p>
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="multiple">Can I make the same to request to lots of authorities, e.g. all councils? <a href="#multiple">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>We ask you to first send a test version of your request to a few
+authorities. Their responses will help you improve the wording of your request,
+so that you get the best information when you send the request to all of
+the authorities. There is currently no automated system for sending the request
+to the other authorities, you must copy and paste it by hand.
+
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="offsite">I made a request off the site, how do I upload it to the archive?<a href="#offsite">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd>WhatDoTheyKnow is an archive of requests made through the site,
+and does not try to be an archive of all FOI requests. We'll never support uploading
+other requests. For one thing, we wouldn't be able to verify that other
+responses actually came from the authority. If this really matters to you,
+you can always make the same request again via WhatDoTheyKnow.
+</dd>
+
+<dt id="moderation">How do you moderate request annotations? <a href="#moderation">#</a> </dt>
+
+<dd> 
+<p>Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help
+people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they
+can go to help them act on it. We reserve the right to remove anything else.
+</p>
+<p>Endless, political discussions are not allowed.
+Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.</p>
+<dd>
+
+</dl>
+
+<p><strong>Next</strong>, read about <a href="/help/privacy">your privacy</a> --&gt;
+
+<div id="hash_link_padding"></div>
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..432c00f2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.en.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<% @title = "Unhappy about a Freedom of Information request?" %>
+
+
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got 
+to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
+</h1>
+<% else %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got?</h1>
+<% end %>
+
+<p>If ...</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>You didn't get a reply within 20 working days</li>
+<li>You did not get all of the information that you requested <strong>or</strong></li>
+<li>Your request was refused, but without a reason valid under the law</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>... you can</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li>Ask for an <strong>internal review</strong> at the public authority.</li>
+<li>If that doesn't help, complain to the <strong>Information Commissioner</strong>.</li>
+<li>Either way, also <strong>use other means</strong> to answer your question.</li>
+</ol>
+
+<h1 id="internal_review">1. Asking for an internal review <a class="hover_a" href="#internal_review">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    Choose <%= link_to "request an internal review", show_response_no_followup_url(:id => @info_request.id, :incoming_message_id => nil) + "?internal_review=1#followup" %> and then write a message asking the authority to review your request.
+<% else %>
+    At the bottom of the relevant request page on WhatDoTheyKnow choose
+    "request an internal review". Then write a message asking for an internal
+    review of your request. You may want to include a link to the
+    request page, to make it clear which request you are talking about.
+<% end %>
+</p>
+
+<p>Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days
+then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take
+longer than 40 working days (see this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf">good
+practice guide</a>).
+You will then either get the information that
+you originally requested, or you will be told that the review upholds the
+original decision.
+</p>
+
+<h1 id="complaining">2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner <a class="hover_a" href="#complaining">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review,
+then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom_of_information.aspx">Complaints about Freedom of Information</a>
+on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish
+authority, then  <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourRights/HowToAppeal/Appeal.asp">appeal
+to the Scottish Information Commissioner</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>To make it easier to send the relevant information to the 
+Information Commissioner, either
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    include a link to your request 
+    <strong><%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %></strong>
+<% else %>
+    include a link to your request on WhatDoTheyKnow
+<% end %>
+in your complaint or print out the whole page of your request and all attachments.
+</p>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow has no special facilities for handling a request at this stage - it
+passes into the Information Commissioner's system. You can leave annotations on your
+request keeping people informed of progress.</p>
+
+<p>A warning. There is a backlog of work at the Information Commissioner, and
+it can take literally years to get resolution from them. If you reach this point,
+you should accept that you won't get the information quickly by this means. Maybe
+you want to help the fight to improve Freedom of Information, or maybe
+getting the information slowly is still worthwhile. You can also try and
+get the information by <strong>other means...</strong></p>
+
+<h1 id="other_means">3. Using other means to answer your question <a class="hover_a" href="#other_means">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>You can try persuing your problem or your research in other ways.
+
+<ul>
+<li>Make a <strong>new FOI request</strong> for summary information, or for
+documentation relating indirectly to matters in your refused request.  
+<a href="/help/contact">Ask us for ideas</a> if you're stuck.</li>
+<li>If any <strong>other public authorities</strong> or publicly owned companies are involved,
+then make FOI requests to them.</li>
+<li>Write to <strong>your MP</strong> or other politician using <a
+href="http://www.writetothem.com">WriteToThem</a> and ask for their help
+finding the answer. MPs can write directly to ministers or departments, and
+can ask written questions in the House of Commons. Councillors in local authorities
+can talk directly to council officers.</li>
+<li>Ask <strong>other researchers</strong> who are interested in a similar 
+issue to yours for ideas. You can sometimes find them by browsing this site;
+contact any registered user from their page. There may be an Internet
+forum or group that they hang out in. If it is a local matter, use <a
+href="http://www.groupsnearyou.com">GroupsNearYou</a> to find such a 
+forum.</li>
+<li><strong>Start a pledge</strong> on <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com">PledgeBank</a> to get 
+others to act together with you. For example, you could arrange a meeting with
+staff from the authority. Or you could form a small local campaigns group.
+</ul>
+
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..432c00f2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<% @title = "Unhappy about a Freedom of Information request?" %>
+
+
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got 
+to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
+</h1>
+<% else %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got?</h1>
+<% end %>
+
+<p>If ...</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>You didn't get a reply within 20 working days</li>
+<li>You did not get all of the information that you requested <strong>or</strong></li>
+<li>Your request was refused, but without a reason valid under the law</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>... you can</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li>Ask for an <strong>internal review</strong> at the public authority.</li>
+<li>If that doesn't help, complain to the <strong>Information Commissioner</strong>.</li>
+<li>Either way, also <strong>use other means</strong> to answer your question.</li>
+</ol>
+
+<h1 id="internal_review">1. Asking for an internal review <a class="hover_a" href="#internal_review">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    Choose <%= link_to "request an internal review", show_response_no_followup_url(:id => @info_request.id, :incoming_message_id => nil) + "?internal_review=1#followup" %> and then write a message asking the authority to review your request.
+<% else %>
+    At the bottom of the relevant request page on WhatDoTheyKnow choose
+    "request an internal review". Then write a message asking for an internal
+    review of your request. You may want to include a link to the
+    request page, to make it clear which request you are talking about.
+<% end %>
+</p>
+
+<p>Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days
+then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take
+longer than 40 working days (see this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf">good
+practice guide</a>).
+You will then either get the information that
+you originally requested, or you will be told that the review upholds the
+original decision.
+</p>
+
+<h1 id="complaining">2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner <a class="hover_a" href="#complaining">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review,
+then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom_of_information.aspx">Complaints about Freedom of Information</a>
+on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish
+authority, then  <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourRights/HowToAppeal/Appeal.asp">appeal
+to the Scottish Information Commissioner</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>To make it easier to send the relevant information to the 
+Information Commissioner, either
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    include a link to your request 
+    <strong><%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %></strong>
+<% else %>
+    include a link to your request on WhatDoTheyKnow
+<% end %>
+in your complaint or print out the whole page of your request and all attachments.
+</p>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow has no special facilities for handling a request at this stage - it
+passes into the Information Commissioner's system. You can leave annotations on your
+request keeping people informed of progress.</p>
+
+<p>A warning. There is a backlog of work at the Information Commissioner, and
+it can take literally years to get resolution from them. If you reach this point,
+you should accept that you won't get the information quickly by this means. Maybe
+you want to help the fight to improve Freedom of Information, or maybe
+getting the information slowly is still worthwhile. You can also try and
+get the information by <strong>other means...</strong></p>
+
+<h1 id="other_means">3. Using other means to answer your question <a class="hover_a" href="#other_means">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>You can try persuing your problem or your research in other ways.
+
+<ul>
+<li>Make a <strong>new FOI request</strong> for summary information, or for
+documentation relating indirectly to matters in your refused request.  
+<a href="/help/contact">Ask us for ideas</a> if you're stuck.</li>
+<li>If any <strong>other public authorities</strong> or publicly owned companies are involved,
+then make FOI requests to them.</li>
+<li>Write to <strong>your MP</strong> or other politician using <a
+href="http://www.writetothem.com">WriteToThem</a> and ask for their help
+finding the answer. MPs can write directly to ministers or departments, and
+can ask written questions in the House of Commons. Councillors in local authorities
+can talk directly to council officers.</li>
+<li>Ask <strong>other researchers</strong> who are interested in a similar 
+issue to yours for ideas. You can sometimes find them by browsing this site;
+contact any registered user from their page. There may be an Internet
+forum or group that they hang out in. If it is a local matter, use <a
+href="http://www.groupsnearyou.com">GroupsNearYou</a> to find such a 
+forum.</li>
+<li><strong>Start a pledge</strong> on <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com">PledgeBank</a> to get 
+others to act together with you. For example, you could arrange a meeting with
+staff from the authority. Or you could form a small local campaigns group.
+</ul>
+
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..432c00f2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/help/unhappy.sr.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<% @title = "Unhappy about a Freedom of Information request?" %>
+
+
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got 
+to your request '<%=request_link(@info_request) %>'?
+</h1>
+<% else %>
+<h1>Unhappy about the response you got?</h1>
+<% end %>
+
+<p>If ...</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>You didn't get a reply within 20 working days</li>
+<li>You did not get all of the information that you requested <strong>or</strong></li>
+<li>Your request was refused, but without a reason valid under the law</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>... you can</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li>Ask for an <strong>internal review</strong> at the public authority.</li>
+<li>If that doesn't help, complain to the <strong>Information Commissioner</strong>.</li>
+<li>Either way, also <strong>use other means</strong> to answer your question.</li>
+</ol>
+
+<h1 id="internal_review">1. Asking for an internal review <a class="hover_a" href="#internal_review">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    Choose <%= link_to "request an internal review", show_response_no_followup_url(:id => @info_request.id, :incoming_message_id => nil) + "?internal_review=1#followup" %> and then write a message asking the authority to review your request.
+<% else %>
+    At the bottom of the relevant request page on WhatDoTheyKnow choose
+    "request an internal review". Then write a message asking for an internal
+    review of your request. You may want to include a link to the
+    request page, to make it clear which request you are talking about.
+<% end %>
+</p>
+
+<p>Internal reviews should be quick. If one takes longer than 20 working days
+then the authority should write and let you know, and it should never take
+longer than 40 working days (see this
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detailed_specialist_guides/foi_good_practice_guidance_5.pdf">good
+practice guide</a>).
+You will then either get the information that
+you originally requested, or you will be told that the review upholds the
+original decision.
+</p>
+
+<h1 id="complaining">2. Complaining to the Information Commissioner <a class="hover_a" href="#complaining">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>If you are still unhappy after the public authority has done their internal review,
+then you can complain to the Information Commissioner. To do this read
+<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/freedom_of_information.aspx">Complaints about Freedom of Information</a>
+on the Information Commissioner's website. If you requested information from a Scottish
+authority, then  <a href="http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/YourRights/HowToAppeal/Appeal.asp">appeal
+to the Scottish Information Commissioner</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>To make it easier to send the relevant information to the 
+Information Commissioner, either
+<% if !@info_request.nil? %>
+    include a link to your request 
+    <strong><%=h main_url(request_url(@info_request)) %></strong>
+<% else %>
+    include a link to your request on WhatDoTheyKnow
+<% end %>
+in your complaint or print out the whole page of your request and all attachments.
+</p>
+
+<p>WhatDoTheyKnow has no special facilities for handling a request at this stage - it
+passes into the Information Commissioner's system. You can leave annotations on your
+request keeping people informed of progress.</p>
+
+<p>A warning. There is a backlog of work at the Information Commissioner, and
+it can take literally years to get resolution from them. If you reach this point,
+you should accept that you won't get the information quickly by this means. Maybe
+you want to help the fight to improve Freedom of Information, or maybe
+getting the information slowly is still worthwhile. You can also try and
+get the information by <strong>other means...</strong></p>
+
+<h1 id="other_means">3. Using other means to answer your question <a class="hover_a" href="#other_means">#</a> </h1>
+
+<p>You can try persuing your problem or your research in other ways.
+
+<ul>
+<li>Make a <strong>new FOI request</strong> for summary information, or for
+documentation relating indirectly to matters in your refused request.  
+<a href="/help/contact">Ask us for ideas</a> if you're stuck.</li>
+<li>If any <strong>other public authorities</strong> or publicly owned companies are involved,
+then make FOI requests to them.</li>
+<li>Write to <strong>your MP</strong> or other politician using <a
+href="http://www.writetothem.com">WriteToThem</a> and ask for their help
+finding the answer. MPs can write directly to ministers or departments, and
+can ask written questions in the House of Commons. Councillors in local authorities
+can talk directly to council officers.</li>
+<li>Ask <strong>other researchers</strong> who are interested in a similar 
+issue to yours for ideas. You can sometimes find them by browsing this site;
+contact any registered user from their page. There may be an Internet
+forum or group that they hang out in. If it is a local matter, use <a
+href="http://www.groupsnearyou.com">GroupsNearYou</a> to find such a 
+forum.</li>
+<li><strong>Start a pledge</strong> on <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com">PledgeBank</a> to get 
+others to act together with you. For example, you could arrange a meeting with
+staff from the authority. Or you could form a small local campaigns group.
+</ul>
+
+
+
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/layout/default.rhtml b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/layout/default.rhtml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ed8ae50aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/lib/views/layout/default.rhtml
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
+<html lang="<%= I18n.locale %>">
+    <head>
+        <script type="text/javascript" src="/jslib/spell/spellChecker.js"></script>
+
+        <% if @profile_photo_javascript %>
+            <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/jquery.js"></script>
+            <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/jquery.Jcrop.js"></script>
+            <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/profile_photo.js"></script>
+            <link rel="stylesheet" href="/stylesheets/jquery.Jcrop.css" type="text/css" >
+        <% end %>
+
+        <title>
+        <% if @title %>
+            <%=@title%> - <%= site_name %>
+        <% else %>
+            <%= site_name %> - <%= _('Make and browse Freedom of Information (FOI) requests') %>
+        <% end %>
+        </title>
+
+        <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico">
+
+        <%= stylesheet_link_tag 'main', :title => "Main", :rel => "stylesheet"  %>
+        <!--[if LT IE 7]> 
+        <style type="text/css">@import url("/stylesheets/ie6.css");</style> 
+        <![endif]-->
+        <!--[if LT IE 7]> 
+        <style type="text/css">@import url("/stylesheets/ie6-custom.css");</style> 
+        <![endif]-->
+        <%= stylesheet_link_tag 'custom', :title => "Main", :rel => "stylesheet"  %>
+
+        <% if @feed_autodetect %>
+            <% for feed in @feed_autodetect %>
+                <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="<%=h feed[:title] %>" href="<%=h feed[:url]%>">
+                <% if feed[:has_json] %>
+                    <link rel="alternate" type="application/json" title="JSON version of <%=h feed[:title] %>" href="<%=h feed[:url]%>.json">
+                <% end %>
+            <% end %>
+        <% end %>
+        <% if @has_json %>
+            <link rel="alternate" type="application/json" title="JSON version of this page" href="<%=h main_url(request.request_uri) %>.json">
+        <% end %>
+
+        <% if @no_crawl %>
+            <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">
+        <% end %>
+
+<% # code for popup advert for a campaign etc.
+=begin
+        <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/jquery.js"></script>
+        <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/jquery.cookie.js"></script>
+
+        <script type="text/javascript">
+
+        document.write('<style type="text/css">.jshide { display: none; }<'+'/style>');
+        $(function(){
+            if (!$.cookie('seen_foi2')) {
+                window.setTimeout(function(){
+                    $('#everypage').slideDown('slow');
+                }, 1000);
+            }
+        });
+
+        </script>
+=end
+%>
+
+    </head>
+    <body>
+
+<% # code for popup advert for a campaign etc.
+=begin
+    <div id="everypage" class="jshide">
+    <p style="float:right"><a href="#top" onclick="$.cookie('seen_foi2', 1, { expires: 7, path: '/' }); $('#everypage').hide('slow'); return false;">Close</a></p>
+    [ message goes here ]
+    <p style="text-align: right"><a href="#top" onclick="$.cookie('seen_foi2', 1, { expires: 7, path: '/' }); $('#everypage').hide('slow'); return false;">Close</a></p>
+    </div>
+=end
+%>
+
+    <div id="header">
+        <h1>
+            <%= link_to site_name, frontpage_url %>
+        </h1>
+        <div id="tagline">
+            <%= _('Make and explore Freedom of Information requests') %>
+        </div>
+	  <%= render :partial => 'general/locale_switcher' %>
+
+    </div>
+	<div id="orglogo">
+	  <%= render :partial => 'general/orglink' %>
+	</div>
+          
+    <div id="navigation_search">
+        <% form_tag({:controller => "general", :action => "search_redirect"}, {:id => "navigation_search_form"}) do %>
+           <p>
+               <%= text_field_tag 'query', params[:query], { :size => 40, :id => "navigation_search_query" } %>
+               <%= submit_tag _("Search") %>
+           </p>
+        <% end %>
+    </div>
+	<div id="topnav">
+		<ul id="navigation">
+            <li><%= link_to _("Make request"), frontpage_url %></li>
+			<li><%= link_to _("View requests"), request_list_successful_url %></li>
+			<li><%= link_to _("View authorities"), list_public_bodies_default %></li>
+			<% if @user %>
+				<li><%=link_to _("My requests"), user_url(@user) %></li>
+			<% end %>
+			<li><%= link_to _("Read blog"), blog_url %></li>
+			<li><%= link_to _("Help"), help_about_url %></li>
+		</ul>
+		<% if not (controller.action_name == 'signin' or controller.action_name == 'signup') %>
+			<div id="logged_in_bar">
+			<% if @user %>
+				<%= _('Hello, {{username}}!', :username => h(@user.name))%>
+				(<%= link_to _("Sign out"), signout_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
+			<% else %>
+			        <%= _('Hello!') %>
+				(<%= link_to _("Sign in or sign up"), signin_url(:r => request.request_uri) %>)
+			<% end %>
+			</div>
+		<% end %>
+	</div>
+	
+    <div id="wrapper">
+        <div id="content">
+
+            <% if flash[:notice] %>
+                <div id="notice"><%= flash[:notice] %></div>
+            <% end %>
+            <% if flash[:error] %>
+                <div id="error"><%= flash[:error] %></div>
+            <% end %>
+
+            <div id="<%= controller.controller_name + "_" + controller.action_name %>" class="controller_<%= controller.controller_name %>">
+            <%= yield :layout %>
+            </div>
+        </div>
+    </div>
+
+    <div id="footer">
+        <%= link_to _("Contact {{site_name}}", :site_name => site_name), help_contact_url %>
+	<%= render :partial => 'general/credits' %>
+    </div>
+
+	<%= render :partial => 'general/before_body_end' %>
+
+    </body>
+</html>
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/tasks/alavetelitheme_tasks.rake b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/tasks/alavetelitheme_tasks.rake
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f1925bfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/tasks/alavetelitheme_tasks.rake
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# desc "Explaining what the task does"
+# task :alavetelitheme do
+#   # Task goes here
+# end
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/alavetelitheme_test.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/alavetelitheme_test.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9e9e34f2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/alavetelitheme_test.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+require 'test_helper'
+
+class AlavetelithemeTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
+  # Replace this with your real tests.
+  test "the truth" do
+    assert true
+  end
+end
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/test_helper.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/test_helper.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cf148b8b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/test/test_helper.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+require 'rubygems'
+require 'active_support'
+require 'active_support/test_case'
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/uninstall.rb b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/uninstall.rb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..973833346
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/plugins/alavetelitheme/uninstall.rb
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# Uninstall hook code here