diff options
| -rwxr-xr-x | script/handle-mail-replies | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/fixtures/files/track-response-webshield-bounce.email | 513 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | spec/script/handle-mail-replies_spec.rb | 6 |
3 files changed, 537 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/script/handle-mail-replies b/script/handle-mail-replies index cc7595bed..aba4ac29b 100755 --- a/script/handle-mail-replies +++ b/script/handle-mail-replies @@ -43,9 +43,16 @@ def main(in_test_mode) return 1 end - if is_oof? message - # Discard out-of-office messages - return 2 + # If we are still here, there are no permanent failures, + # so if the message is a multipart/report then it must be + # reporting a temporary failure. In this case we discard it + if message.content_type == "multipart/report" + return 1 + end + + # Discard out-of-office messages + if is_oof?(message) + return 2 # Use a different return code, to distinguish OOFs from bounces end # Otherwise forward the message on @@ -94,6 +101,14 @@ def permanently_failed_addresses(message) end end + # Then look for the style we’ve seen in WebShield bounces + # (These do not have a return path of <> in the cases I have seen.) + if message.header_string("Subject") == "Returned Mail: Error During Delivery" + if message.body =~ /^\s*---- Failed Recipients ----\s*((?:<[^>]+>\n)+)/ + return $1.scan(/<([^>]+)>/).flatten + end + end + return [] end diff --git a/spec/fixtures/files/track-response-webshield-bounce.email b/spec/fixtures/files/track-response-webshield-bounce.email new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1fd0f68ef --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/fixtures/files/track-response-webshield-bounce.email @@ -0,0 +1,513 @@ +Delivered-To: mysociety.robin@gmail.com +Received: by 10.216.93.2 with SMTP id k2csp412wef; + Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:10:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.216.200.90 with SMTP id y68mr994412wen.49.1335651006883; + Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:10:06 -0700 (PDT) +Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk> +Received: from wildfire.ukcod.org.uk (wildfire.ukcod.org.uk. [89.238.145.74]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9si8451394wib.28.2012.04.28.15.10.06 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:10:06 -0700 (PDT) +Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of MAILER-DAEMON@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk designates 89.238.145.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=89.238.145.74; +Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of MAILER-DAEMON@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk designates 89.238.145.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=MAILER-DAEMON@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk +Received: from foi by wildfire.ukcod.org.uk with local (Exim 4.72) + (envelope-from <MAILER-DAEMON@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk>) + id 1SOFq3-0002Lx-HQ + for team_delivery@whatdotheyknow.com; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:59 +0100 +Received: from majestic.ukcod.org.uk ([89.238.145.68]:48989) + by wildfire.ukcod.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) + id 1SOFq2-0002La-Pq + for foi-track@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:59 +0100 +Received: from mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([93.174.8.200]:65135) + by majestic.ukcod.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) + id 1SOFps-0001uQ-4T + for track@whatdotheyknow.com; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:48 +0100 +Message-Id: <f8b79b$go3iov@mailproxy1.example.co.uk> +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154271" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:37 +0100 +From: Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR3 Mail Service +Date: Sat Apr 28 23:09:37 2012 +To: <track@whatdotheyknow.com> +Subject: Returned Mail: Error During Delivery + + ---- Failed Recipients ---- + +<failed.user@example.co.uk> +Mail Loop Detected + + +Requested action aborted: Mail loop detected + + ---- Contents of the undelivered mail ---- + +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650976813; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:36 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154267" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:36 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650976250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:36 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154266" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:36 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650975812; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:35 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154264" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:35 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650975250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:35 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154263" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:35 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650974469; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:34 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154259" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:34 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650973250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:33 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154255" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:33 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650972250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:32 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154253" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:32 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650971250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:31 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154250" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:31 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650970797; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:30 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154247" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:30 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650970250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:30 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154246" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:30 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650969797; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:29 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154244" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:29 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650969250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:29 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154243" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:29 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650968250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:28 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154241" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:28 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650967250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:27 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154238" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:27 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650966250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:26 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154236" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:26 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650965828; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:25 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154235" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:25 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650965250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:25 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154234" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:25 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650964781; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:24 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154233" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:24 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650964250; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:24 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154231" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:24 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy1.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.80]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 1335650963281; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:23 +0100 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="562154222" +Received: from unknown (HELO so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk) ([10.56.10.5]) + by mailproxy1.example.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:18 +0100 +Received: From mailproxy2.example.co.uk ([192.168.80.81]) by so-itws3.so.ad.example.co.uk (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR3) + id 133565095893; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:18 +0100 +X-SBRS: 2.9 +X-SG: DEFAULT +X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true +X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnQDAGtpnE9Z7pFKgWdsb2JhbAA8B4Mpgj+sMSIBARYmJ4F8AQgBCwIgJhgQAQEVIAYCCQgHDgICAw0sFgsYhUMBAYItARkHpjJSkUqBL4EliDMFB4JeghmBGASMYYEwmxiBUwgLAw +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,497,1330905600"; + d="scan'208";a="514125909" +Received: from wildfire.ukcod.org.uk ([89.238.145.74]) + by mailproxy2.example.co.uk with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2012 23:09:12 +0100 +Received: from foi by wildfire.ukcod.org.uk with local (Exim 4.72) + (envelope-from <track@whatdotheyknow.com>) + id 1SOFpI-0002Iz-6a + for failed.user@example.co.uk; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:12 +0100 +Message-Id: <E1SOFpI-0002Iz-6a@wildfire.ukcod.org.uk> +Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:09:10 +0100 +From: WhatDoTheyKnow <track@whatdotheyknow.com> +To: Failed User <failed.user@example.co.uk> +Subject: Your WhatDoTheyKnow email alert +Mime-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Precedence: bulk +Auto-Submitted: auto-generated + +Successful Freedom of Information requests +========================================== + +-- geographical address for PO Box 1244, Enfield, EN1 9UF -- +Royal Mail Group Limited sent a response to Mr Mahmood (16 March 2012) + "Dear Mr Mahmood, Please find attached a response to your recent + Freedom of Information Request. Yours Sincerely Kate Fearn Company + Secretary's..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/geographical_address_for_po_box_3#incoming-264886 + +-- Foi About Animal Testin -- +University of Strathclyde sent a response to Mr Jonathon Proctor (27 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Proctor,  FOI Request Reference – 2012/050  Thank you + for your email of 03 April 2012 requesting information under the + Freedom of I..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/foi_about_animal_testin#incoming-277502 + +-- School's Spend on Recruitment Advertising -- +Staffordshire County Council sent a response to Robert Saunders ( 3 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Saunders Re: Freedom of Information Act 2000 Thank you for + your request for information. We have completed the search of our + records and pl..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/schools_spend_on_recruitment_adv_8#incoming-270606 + +-- WBC - Enforcement Team Dog Mess -- +Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council sent a response to Pete Sheffield (26 April 2012) + "Hello Pete Sheffield  Thank you for your request below, Wirral + Council is able to supply the following recorded information, I + have included res..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/wbc_enforcement_team_dog_mess#incoming-277027 + +-- City Garden Project technical feasibility study -- +Aberdeen City Council sent a response to Kenneth Watt (24 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Watt Thank you for your information request of 17 April + 2012, made under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 + (FOISA). Aberdeen C..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/city_garden_project_technical_fe#incoming-276087 + +-- Government grant -- +Lambeth Borough Council sent a response to Ed Clarke (17 April 2012) + "Dear Ed Clarke, Thank you for your FOI request under reference + 156969 Please accept my apologies for the late response. You asked + " What was the to..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/government_grant#incoming-274144 + +-- Advertising Policy -- +Humber Bridge Board sent a response to Mr. A. Wilson (24 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Wilson Thank you for your email of 23rd April 2012. As the + Humber Bridge Board is not a Public Body it is not formally subject + to the Freedo..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/advertising_policy#incoming-276348 + +-- Number of roads/estates/areas in the process of being adopted by Oxfordshire County Council -- +Oxfordshire County Council sent a response to Alex Lalvani (17 April 2012) + "Dear Mr. Lalvani  Please find below the definition of an + ‘agreement’ as requested by you further to our response to your + Freedom of Information..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_roadsestatesareas_in_t#incoming-273742 + +-- Correct Diagnosis of Lyme Disease -- +Health Protection Agency sent a response to jacqui butterworth (24 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Butterworth I would like to apologise, for not responding + to the last point you raised in your email of 29th March, regarding + information y..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/correct_diagnosis_of_lyme_diseas#incoming-276391 + +-- Genesis -- +Camden Borough Council sent a response to salim (24 April 2012) + "Camden Council - Information request (FOI/EIR) - Housing and adult + social care Our reference: 7706354 + -------------------------------------------..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/genesis#incoming-276075 + +-- Missing Persons -- +Humberside Police sent a response to Otis Holmes ( 1 March 2012) + "Your Ref:  Our Ref: F-2012-351  1 March 2012 Dear Mr Holmes, + Please find attached my response to your recent Freedom of + Information requ..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/missing_persons_2#incoming-260422 + +-- A reply to my two previous emails -- +Blackpool Borough Council sent a response to Debbie Tomkinson ( 8 December 2011) + "Dear Debbie FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 - INFORMATION REQUEST + I am writing in response to your email of 09.11.12. You were + previously employed..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/a_reply_to_my_two_previous_email#incoming-234255 + +-- Expenditure of public funds by Police & CPS on persecution of World War 2 Veteran Norman Scarth -- +Ministry of Justice sent a response to Norman Scarth (24 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Scarth,  Please find herewith our reply to your Freedom + of Information request dated 3rd April 2012.   Mrs K Smith  Mrs + K Smith R..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/expenditure_of_public_funds_by_p#incoming-276263 + +-- Security screening at Edinburgh Airport -- +UK Border Agency sent a response to S Gray ( 5 April 2012) + "Sent on behalf of Anne Webber  Dear Mr Gray,  Please find + attached the FOI response.  Kind Regards  Sue  Sue Dinham + Cyclame..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/security_screening_at_edinburgh#incoming-271223 + +-- Inverness business improvement district (BID) -- +Highland Council sent a response to Laurel Bush (27 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Bush,  Please find attached the response from William + Gilfillan, in relation to the above Freedom of Information request + dated 26 April..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/inverness_business_improvement_d_2#incoming-277507 + +-- Waiting times in Contact Applications -- +Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service sent a response to Philip J Measures (24 April 2012) + "Dear Sir Please find atatched a response to your recent request + for an internal review. Any additioanl information will be provided + by 8th May 2012...." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/waiting_times_in_contact_applica#incoming-276410 + +-- Payments to companies on behalf of directors -- +Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust sent a response to Alex Miller ( 5 March 2012) + "Dear Alex Miller  In response to your clarification of 8.2.12, + payments made to permanent managers  and directors employed at the + Trust  are pai..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/payments_to_companies_on_behalf#incoming-261184 + +-- Personal Injury Claims -- +Leeds City Council sent a response to Ben Stanley ( 3 April 2012) + "Dear Ben Stanley Please accept my apologies regarding the in + responding to your request. Please see attached letter in respect + of your recent Free..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/personal_injury_claims_10#incoming-270346 + +-- Beetham Tower West £750,000 payment. -- +Liverpool City Council sent a response to A Rudkin (24 April 2012) + "Please find attached response Regards, Kevin Symm Senior + Information Officer Legal Services Liverpool City Council Municipal + Buildings Dale St..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/beetham_tower_west_750000_paymen_3#incoming-276145 + +-- Housing Benefit statistics -- +Leeds City Council sent a response to Peter Balderston (17 February 2012) + "Dear Mr Balderston, Please see attached letter in respect of your + recent Freedom of Information request. Please contact me if you + have any furthe..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/housing_benefit_statistics_19#incoming-255605 + +-- Board Minutes - Accuracy & Completeness -- +Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust sent a response to Steven King (24 April 2012) + "Dear Mr King, Please see attached correspondence regarding your + Freedom of Information request: <<0718 Response Letter.doc>> Yours + sincerely,..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/board_minutes_accuracy_completen#incoming-276314 + +-- Marked vehicle fleet list -- +Gloucestershire Constabulary sent a response to luke (27 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Staddon, Gloucestershire Constabulary Freedom of + Information request 2012.3788 On the 28th March 2012 you sent a + letter constituting a requ..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/marked_vehicle_fleet_list_7#incoming-277276 + +-- Quality metrics for decisionmakers. -- +Department for Work and Pensions sent a response to Ian Stirling (26 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Stirling Please see attached response to your FoI request. + Kind regards DWP Central FoI Team Website: www.dwp.gov.uk Your + Reference: I St..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/quality_metrics_for_decisionmake#incoming-276968 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Hello Carla  Thank you for your further enquiry, I can clarify  + Strays 76  and a further Handovers by owner (sick or aggressive) + 74..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_84#incoming-274073 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Wakefield City Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Dear Carla, Freedom of Information Act 2000 - Request for + Information I am writing in respect of your recent enquiry for + information held by the Aut..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_149#incoming-273859 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Bottle Thank you for your email. Any dogs collected as + strays are taken to Birmingham Dogs Home, where they are detained + by the home on the..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_136#incoming-273886 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Newham Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Bottle, Thank you for your email received on 16/03/2012. + We attach our response under the disclosure provisions of the + Freedom of Information..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_152#incoming-273897 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +St Edmundsbury Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Dear Carla, Thank you for your email following my response to your + Freedom of Information request. I can advise that the 15 dogs that + were 'rehomed..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_111#incoming-273946 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Staffordshire Moorlands District Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "E-mail:  [1][FOI #109668 email]    Dear Ms Bottle  Re: + Freedom of Information Act request – Stray Dogs  Thank you for + your e..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_108#incoming-274005 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Southwark Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Southwark Council - Information request (FOI/EIR) Our reference: + 214355 + --------------------------------------------------------------------------..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_155#incoming-274104 + +-- Residential Building Revaluation Costs -- +Camden Borough Council sent a response to Peter CAIN (17 April 2012) + "Dear Mr Cain  Herewith the reply of the Panel to your application + for an internal review  Yours sincerely  Peter Swingler Obo + Internal Revie..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/residential_building_revaluation#incoming-274061 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Waveney District Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (17 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Bottle, Freedom of Information Request - Ref No 9932 I am + writing in response to your recently submitted Freedom of + Information request reg..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_112#incoming-274145 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Tamworth Borough Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (27 April 2012) + "Our Ref: FOI1264/DB/02 Please ask for: Derek Bolton Direct dial: + 01827 709 587 E-mail: [email address]  Ms C Bottle + Whatdotheyknow.com..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_110#incoming-277348 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +South Northamptonshire District Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (23 April 2012) + "South Northamptonshire Council Request Ref: 1013066  Springfields + Towcester Date: Apr 5 2012 Northants NN12 6AE" +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_89#incoming-275624 + +-- Stray Dogs -- +Selby District Council sent a response to Carla Bottle (23 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Bottle  I refer to your recent request for information + under the Freedom of Information Act. I have now had an opportunity + to check our..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/stray_dogs_148#incoming-275917 + +-- DASS Carers Assesment Documents -- +Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council sent a response to Heston O Riley (26 April 2012) + "Hello Heston O Riley  Thank you for request below, apologies for + the slight delay, Wirral Council can now provide the information + you have r..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/dass_carers_assesment_documents#incoming-277203 + +-- Traffic offences on Holland Park Barton Under Needwood -- +Staffordshire Police sent a response to Joanne Cooper (24 April 2012) + "Please see another response to your FOI request.   Apologies, but + please discard my first response.  The letter will give an + explanation. Regards..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/traffic_offences_on_holland_park#incoming-276112 + +-- Percy Street - Capita report input -- +Newcastle upon Tyne City Council sent a response to Katja Leyendecker (16 April 2012) + "Katja, Firstly let me apologise for the tardy delivery of the + response, I have been on annual leave and did not return until this + morning. I'm afrai..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/percy_street_capita_report_input#incoming-273690 + +-- AREa REView COMMITTee CHILd PROtection GUIDElines -- +Nottinghamshire County Council sent a response to Alison Stevens (27 April 2012) + "REF:C&IT/PFL/NCC-007511-11  Dear Ms Stevens  FREEDOM OF + INFORMATION ACT 2000 - INFORMATION REQUEST  In response to your + request for the..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/area_review_committee_child_prot#incoming-277510 + +-- Atos HeathcarE Risk AsseSSMENTS -- +Department for Work and Pensions sent a response to Alison Stevens (27 April 2012) + "Dear Ms Stevens Please see attached response to your FoI request. + Kind regards DWP Central FoI Team To A Stevens C/o [FOI #107839 + email] DWP Centr..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/atos_heathcare_risk_assessments#incoming-277463 + +-- SET(0) Postal Applications status D2c 2011 -- +UK Border Agency sent a response to S Pillai (29 March 2012) + "S Pillai  Please find the response to your request for + information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, regarding + SET (O) applications...." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/set0_postal_applications_status#incoming-269113 + +-- re London Borough of Bromley -- +Local Government Ombudsmen sent a response to ROSEMARY CANTWELL (Account suspended) ( 3 April 2012) + "Dear Mrs Cantwell I have consulted colleagues and they inform me + that you have exhausted our internal complaints procedures and + there is nothing more..." +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re_london_borough_of_bromley#incoming-270360 + + +Alter your subscription +======================= + + +http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/c/abcdefghijklmnop23 + +-- the WhatDoTheyKnow team + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/spec/script/handle-mail-replies_spec.rb b/spec/script/handle-mail-replies_spec.rb index ad58ea565..0aa10323e 100644 --- a/spec/script/handle-mail-replies_spec.rb +++ b/spec/script/handle-mail-replies_spec.rb @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ describe "When filtering" do r.out.should == "user@example.com\n" end + it "should detect a WebShield delivery error message" do + r = mail_reply_test("track-response-webshield-bounce.email") + r.status.should == 1 + r.out.should == "failed.user@example.co.uk\n" + end + it "should pass on a non-bounce message" do r = mail_reply_test("incoming-request-bad-uuencoding.email") r.status.should == 0 |