Remove copyright section, as it is much more complicated than it says.

(See email thread "Pseudonyms")

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/app/views/help/about.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.rhtml
index ad80222f5..be046e2fb 100644
--- a/app/views/help/about.rhtml
+++ b/app/views/help/about.rhtml
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual.
 The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on
 the Internet.
 </p>
-<p>If you have privacy or copyright concerns, please read the answers below.
+<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below.
 You might also like to read this page <a
 href="/help/about">from the top</a> to find out more about what
 the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the
@@ -282,16 +282,6 @@ block them when that happens. </p>
 <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p>
 </dd>
 
-<dt id="copyright">Won't I be breaking copyright law by sending a response that you then publish?</dt>
-
-<dd>No, you will simply be replying to an FOI request by email (the "expressed
-preference" of the requester, under
-<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2000/plain/ukpga_20000036_en#pt1-pb1-l1g11">section
-11(1)</a> of the Freedom of Information Act). That we are later republishing your
-response is a separate matter, and not something which FOIA lists as a reason
-for rejecting a request.
-</dd>
-
 <dt id="names">Isn't it a problem that you publish the names of civil servants
 and the text of emails?</dt>