diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | app/views/help/about.rhtml | 12 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/app/views/help/about.rhtml b/app/views/help/about.rhtml index ad80222f5..be046e2fb 100644 --- a/app/views/help/about.rhtml +++ b/app/views/help/about.rhtml @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an individual. The only difference is that your response will be automatically published on the Internet. </p> -<p>If you have privacy or copyright concerns, please read the answers below. +<p>If you have privacy or other concerns, please read the answers below. You might also like to read this page <a href="/help/about">from the top</a> to find out more about what the site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the @@ -282,16 +282,6 @@ block them when that happens. </p> <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/20080806100741260.pdf">letter from the ICO to Rother District Council</a> gives some guidance on the matter.</p> </dd> -<dt id="copyright">Won't I be breaking copyright law by sending a response that you then publish?</dt> - -<dd>No, you will simply be replying to an FOI request by email (the "expressed -preference" of the requester, under -<a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2000/plain/ukpga_20000036_en#pt1-pb1-l1g11">section -11(1)</a> of the Freedom of Information Act). That we are later republishing your -response is a separate matter, and not something which FOIA lists as a reason -for rejecting a request. -</dd> - <dt id="names">Isn't it a problem that you publish the names of civil servants and the text of emails?</dt> |